刑法第306条适用之分析
发布时间:2018-03-31 09:56
本文选题:刑法306条 切入点:典型案例 出处:《哈尔滨商业大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国刑事法律规范体系日益完备的大趋势下,仍有部分法条在法律适用方面存在很大问题,由此而引发各界争议也从未停止。我国刑法第306条是1997年刑法典中新增的内容之一,自其出台以来,就因为其法条适用内容的不明确以及法条适用理念问题引发诸多争议,尤其在"北海律师案"和"李庄案"发生后,对于该法条的存废之争达到顶峰。然而仅停留在"存废之争"的认识层面并不能实际解决刑法第306条适用难题,关键是要从立法者本意来审视,结合我国的司法实际来分析本罪适用中所暴露的问题和缺陷,通过对本罪适用问题的原因剖析来提出完善适用建议,以便达到刑法条文适用的公正和控辩双方地位的平衡发展。所以全盘否定本罪规定内容亦或是完全回避本罪缺陷的做法都不妥。对本罪正确的看法应该是立足本罪的规范基础,修正完善本罪适用条件和内容,以便更好解决本罪适用中问题。本文以实证研究为主,将正文分为三部分。第一部分,从"刑法第306条"基本内容入手,先介绍本罪的立法目的,设立的法理基础,同时概述分析本罪犯罪构成,然后介绍各派对本罪的态度和看法;第二部分,首先对系列典型案例简要介绍和分析,然后再总结出本罪适用中暴露的共性问题,并对此做出分析;第三部分,主要是从法治理念、实体法内容明确以及追诉程序完善方面给出刑法第306条正确适用之建议。
[Abstract]:In the general trend of our country's criminal law normative system being increasingly complete, there are still some legal provisions in the application of the law has a lot of problems, Article 306 of our Criminal Law is one of the new contents in the Criminal Code of 1997. Since its introduction, it has caused many disputes because of the unclear content of its applicable articles and the concept of its application. Especially after "Beihai lawyer case" and "Li Zhuang case" occurred, the debate on the retention and abolition of this article reached its peak. However, only staying at the level of understanding of "dispute between retention and abolition" could not actually solve the difficult problem of applying Article 306 of the Criminal Law. The key is to analyze the problems and defects in the application of this crime from the point of view of the intention of the legislator and the judicial reality of our country, and put forward some suggestions to perfect the application of the crime through the analysis of the reasons for the application of the crime. In order to achieve the fair application of the articles of the Criminal Law and the balanced development of the status of both the prosecution and the defence. Therefore, it is inappropriate to completely deny the contents of the provisions of this crime or completely avoid the defects of the crime. The correct view of this crime should be the normative basis based on this crime. Revise and improve the applicable conditions and contents of this crime in order to better solve the problems in the application of this crime. This paper mainly focuses on empirical research, and divides the text into three parts. The first part begins with the basic content of Article 306 of Criminal Law. First introduce the legislative purpose of the crime, the legal basis of the establishment, at the same time outline and analyze the composition of the crime, and then introduce the attitude and views of the various parties on this crime; the second part, first, a series of typical cases are briefly introduced and analyzed. Then summarizes the common problems exposed in the application of this crime, and makes an analysis of this; the third part, mainly from the concept of the rule of law, substantive law content clear and prosecution procedures to improve the correct application of the proposed 306 criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨商业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 蒋铃;;我国《刑法》第306条的批判及其救济路径[J];法律适用;2013年06期
2 孙万怀;;从李庄案看辩护人伪造证据、妨害作证罪的认定[J];法学;2010年04期
3 陈泽宪;;罪刑法定与扩大解释[J];人民检察;2007年19期
,本文编号:1690226
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1690226.html