空白罪状研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 07:41

本文选题：空白罪状 + 补充规范　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：空白罪状是刑法分则条文规定的犯罪须参照相关规范确定其具体行为要件的犯罪模型。空白罪状的焦点是清晰补充性规范的内容或具体探问其到位的情况。为此，本文探究空白罪状的思想基础和理性根据，在梳理刑法条文的基础上和对空白罪状类型化归纳的基础上，对空白罪状结构进行系统的整理和分析。文章分四部分，共三万字。第一部分，概述空白罪状概念与特征。首先，界定空白罪状的概念，分析其与构成要件的关系；其次，将空白罪状与参见罪状进行比较，分析它们的异同，清晰其特征；再次，探讨空白罪状在整个罪状体系中的地位。第二部分，阐释空白罪状的理论基础与设立根据。首先，从罪刑法定的实质要求分析设置和解读空白罪状的理论基础，由此从罪刑法定的形式侧面讨论空白罪状的规范性、从罪刑法定的实质侧面阐明空白罪状不等于空缺构成要件的实质；其次，以刑法谦抑性原则为根基性要求，展开找法源的论证过程，确保犯罪标准的合理把握；最后，表明空白罪状的存在不仅是体系性架构法律的客观需要也是法定犯内在规律的要求。第三部分，对空白罪状进行类型化分析。首先，，将空白罪状分为典型的空白罪状、非典型的空白罪状类型，同时清晰应当排除的情形，为讨论便利，用表格形式展示这些类型的分布概况；其次，为分析非典型空白罪状的特点，择取渎职罪中相关条文为切入点；再次，分析归纳应当排除的情形；最后，总结空白罪状的分布规律。第四部分，对空白罪状结构要素的分析。被援引的规范性文件被称为空白罪状的补充规范，对空白罪状结构性要素的分析实则就是对补充规范的分析。首先，讨论补充规范的表述形式、位阶、范围和内容；其次，找法源的过程引出对司法解释作用与风险的分析，一方面，揭示它在空白罪状所属条文与补充规范之间所起的沟通、联系作用即纽带和媒介的作用，另一方面，以非法经营罪为例，分析与空白罪状相关的司法解释呈现逾越补充规范范围的现象，进而指出造法的风险所在；最后，进一步清晰补充规范和刑法条文的密切关联，补充规范的作用是填补空白罪状所在刑法条文缺失的行为要件的具体内容，起着封闭和充实犯罪构成要件的作用，这本身对我国行政立法能力和水平提出了更高的要求，同时，本文就如何实现补充规范和刑法条文的良性对接，提出了解决的路径。
[Abstract]:Blank crime is a criminal model in which the criminal law stipulates that the crime must be determined according to the relevant norms. The focus of blank crime is to clarify the content of the supplementary specification or to inquire into the situation in place. Therefore, this paper explores the ideological basis and rational basis of blank crime, on the basis of combing the articles of criminal law and on the basis of the classification and induction of blank crime, the structure of blank crime is systematically arranged and analyzed. The article is divided into four parts, a total of 30,000 words. The first part summarizes the concept and characteristics of blank crime. First of all, define the concept of blank crime, analyze the relationship between blank crime and constitutive elements; secondly, compare blank crime with synonyms, analyze their similarities and differences, clarify their characteristics; third, To discuss the position of blank crime in the whole crime system. The second part explains the theoretical basis and establishment basis of blank crime. First of all, the theoretical basis of setting up and interpreting blank crime is analyzed and interpreted from the essence of legally prescribed crime, and the normative of blank crime is discussed from the aspect of the form of crime criminal law. From the essence side of the crime criminal law to clarify that blank crime does not equal to the essence of the vacant elements; secondly, to base on the principle of modesty of criminal law, to start the process of seeking legal source of argument to ensure the reasonable assurance of the crime standard; finally, It shows that the existence of blank crime is not only the objective need of systematic structure law, but also the requirement of the inherent law of legal offense. The third part analyzes the types of blank crimes. First, categorize blank counts into typical blank counts, atypical blank crime types, and make clear the situations that should be excluded so as to facilitate the discussion by presenting the distribution of these types in tabular form; second, In order to analyze the characteristics of atypical blank crime, select the relevant articles in the crime of dereliction of duty as the starting point; thirdly, analyze the circumstances that should be excluded; finally, summarize the distribution of blank crime. The fourth part analyzes the structural elements of blank crime. The cited normative documents are referred to as the supplementary norms of blank crimes, and the analysis of structural elements of blank crimes is the analysis of supplementary norms. First, it discusses the form, rank, scope and content of the supplementary norms. Secondly, the process of finding the source of law leads to the analysis of the function and risk of judicial interpretation. On the one hand, It reveals the communication between the article of blank crime and the supplementary norm, the link function that is the link and the function of the media. On the other hand, taking the crime of illegal business as an example, This paper analyzes the phenomenon that the judicial interpretation related to blank crime is beyond the scope of supplementary norms, and then points out the risk of making the law. Finally, it further clarifies the close relationship between the supplementary norms and the articles of criminal law. The role of supplementary norms is to fill in the specific contents of the behavior elements that are missing in the articles of criminal law, and play the role of closing and enriching the constitutive elements of crimes, which in itself puts forward higher requirements for the ability and level of administrative legislation in our country, at the same time, This article puts forward the way to solve how to realize the benign docking between the supplementary norms and the articles of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】