正当防卫认定标准主观化——一场英美刑法引发的革命

发布时间：2018-06-06 05:25

本文选题：正当防卫 + 主观标准　；参考：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2016年01期

【摘要】：正当防卫在英美法系中与大陆法系中大相径庭。本文首先分析英美法系中正当防卫的类型,梳理出防卫人身与防卫财产两类,从而可以与大陆法系中正当防卫成立条件比较。英美法系中正当防卫的成立均采用主观标准,以行为人为视角,以"真诚而合理"为纽带,构建正当防卫成立体系。英美法系的主观化标准的引入有利于弥补大陆法系正当防卫现有理论的不足。以防卫限度为例,行为过当说、结果过当说、二重标准说均具缺陷,捉襟见肘。大陆法系框架下的正当防卫构造在其他问题上也存在诸多问题,因而英美法系主观标准的引入对问题的解决颇有裨益。
[Abstract]:Legitimate defense is quite different from civil law in Anglo-American law system. This paper first analyzes the types of justifiable defense in Anglo-American law system, combing out two categories of defense personal and defensive property, so as to compare with the establishment conditions of legitimate defense in continental law system. The establishment of justifiable defense in Anglo-American law system adopts subjective standard, takes the actor as the visual angle, and takes "sincerity and rationality" as the link to construct the establishment system of legitimate defense. The introduction of the subjective standard of Anglo-American law system helps to make up for the deficiency of the existing theory of legitimate defense in civil law system. Take the defense limit as an example, the behavior overstatement, the result overstatement, the double standard theory all have the flaw, the limit. There are many problems in the structure of legitimate defense under the framework of civil law system, so the introduction of subjective standard in common law system is helpful to solve the problem.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】