教唆犯独立性研究

发布时间：2018-06-09 23:44

本文选题：教唆犯 + 独立性　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：共同犯罪现象一直是刑法学界最热门的议题，而教唆犯罪更是共犯研究者们致力研究的热点。放眼国内外刑法理论的研究现状，“教唆犯独立性说”和“教唆犯从属性说”相互批判和博弈长期存在，使得研究的热度如火如荼。虽然通说以“教唆犯二重性”的观点来加以调和，但只是使得两对立观点之争得到短时间的偃旗息鼓，却从未使两派达成一致而真正告一段落。国内有学者指出教唆行为性质的确认是教唆犯理论研究的首要问题。诚然，教唆犯性质的确定是研究教唆犯其他理论的基石和起点，所以正确认识和把握教唆犯的性质，有助刑法研究者进一步研究教唆犯的完成形态、教唆犯的犯罪构成、教唆犯的处罚根据以及教唆犯在刑法中的地位等其他理论。所谓“前人种树后人乘凉”，先哲们的刑法思潮给后人们留下了难以估量的帮助和启迪，他们的研究成果给新一辈年轻学者们留下了宝贵的研究思路和研究方法，无论本文阐述得成功与否，笔者都是站在一大批“巨人”的肩膀上。各论者们在阐述教唆犯性质的观点时，无论是自成一派或是对原有观点进行修正，都少不了对那些观点的引证和描述。本文共分三个部分，字数近六万字，主要内容如下：第一部分是关于教唆犯性质的理论聚讼。这一部分笔者通过比较和总结，根据各学说的基本主张把它们分为四个大类，分析了各类学说的缺陷，，阐述了这些学说对笔者后文的论述所带来的启示。第二部分是关于教唆犯本质的理论剖析。这一部分重点介绍了教唆犯从属性和独立性两学说的对立，以及两观点对立的实质。该部分首先对通说的二重性进行展开，分析出隐藏在这传统观点下的理论矛盾以及二重性表象的对立，进而在后文中对教唆犯从属性学说和独立性学说分别展开论述，从传统的论据中找出论述中的缺陷和破绽，引出笔者对教唆犯性质的实质的理解。第三部分是关于教唆犯独立性的理论探索。这一部分笔者首先对“间接教唆”、“教唆他人自杀自残”、分则中教唆独立罪名等现象进行阐述，通过这些现象的分析对教唆犯从属性的观点产生质疑，然后联系教唆犯区别与其他共犯的特性对教唆犯的独立性进行阐述，进而得出自己对教唆行为在非共犯阶段和共犯阶段的独立性的不同理解，最后结合笔者主张的“犯罪构成独立”、“处罚独立”等观点来适用和处理司法实践中相关教唆犯问题。总而言之，教唆行为性质的研究无论是对教唆犯理论本身的夯实和完善，还是对其他刑法问题的运用和指导，都具有着非常重大的理论价值和实践意义。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of joint crime has always been the hottest topic in the criminal law field, and the abetting crime is the research hotspot of accomplice researchers. Looking at the current research situation of criminal law theory at home and abroad, the mutual criticism and game between abettor independence theory and abettor accessory theory exist for a long time, which makes the research hot. Although the general theory is conciliated by the view of "the duality of abettor", it only causes the dispute between the two opposing views to be silenced for a short period of time. Some domestic scholars have pointed out that the confirmation of the nature of abetting act is the primary problem in the theoretical study of abettor. It is true that the determination of the nature of the abettor is the cornerstone and starting point of studying the other theories of the abettor, so the correct understanding and grasp of the nature of the abettor will help the criminal law researchers to further study the completion form of the abettor and the criminal constitution of the abettor. The basis for the punishment of abettors and other theories such as the status of abettors in the criminal law. The so-called "the former planted trees for later generations to take advantage of the cool", the ideological trend in criminal law of the forefathers and philosophers left incalculable help and inspiration to the posterity. Their research results have left valuable research ideas and methods for the new generation of young scholars. Whether this paper is successful or not, the author stands on the shoulders of a large number of "giants". In expounding the nature of the abettor, all the commentators, whether they are in the same school or revising the original views, cannot fail to cite and describe those views. This paper is divided into three parts, with nearly 60,000 words. The main contents are as follows: the first part is about the theory of abettor. This part of the author through comparison and summary, according to the basic claims of each theory to divide them into four broad categories, analyzed the defects of various theories, The second part is about the theoretical analysis of the nature of abettor. This part focuses on the adversarial and independence of abettor, as well as the essence of the opposition. This part begins with the duality of the general theory, analyzes the theoretical contradictions hidden in this traditional view and the opposition of the duality representation, and then discusses the theory of accessory attribute and the theory of independence of the abettor respectively in the following articles. From the traditional argument to find out the defects and flaws in the discussion, leading to the author's essence of the nature of the instigator understanding. The third part is about the theoretical exploration of the independence of the abettor. In this part, the author first expounds the phenomena of "indirect abetting", "abetting others to commit suicide self-harm", abetting the crime of independence, and so on. Through the analysis of these phenomena, the author questions the views of the accomplice of the abettor. Then the independence of the abettor is expounded in relation to the distinction between the abettor and the other accomplices, and the different understandings of the independence of the abettor in the non-accomplice stage and the accomplice stage are obtained. Finally, combining the author's viewpoints of "independent constitution of crime" and "independence of punishment" to apply and deal with the problems of abettor in judicial practice. The study of the nature of abettor behavior is of great theoretical value and practical significance whether it is the consolidation and perfection of the theory of abettor itself or the application and guidance of other criminal law issues.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】