刑法解释的路径选择—确定性之理论愿景与不确定性之司法实践

发布时间：2018-06-10 03:31

本文选题：刑法解释 + 确定性　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法的本质是在一定的时空等环境背景之下的,司法人员的主观见之于法律文本和案件事实并生成裁判结果的过程。其中,无权解释是司法的关键因素,司法语境的法内因素、法中因素、法外因素、法上因素这四大因素对无权解释有着极大的影响。司法实践的语境中,刑法解释是在刑法的精神、理念、原则的指导之下,并受司法语境中四大因素影响的,对刑法规范作出个案的具体化的说明过程。司法实践为刑法解释提供大环境,刑法解释是司法实践的主要内容。刑法解释永远在司法实践中进行,脱离了司法实践的刑法解释其本质不是解释行为,而是立法行为。须要特别说明的是,文意解释、体系解释、目的解释等解释方法都可以将个案解释成完全不同的结论,都是可以被最终选择的解释路径,不存在何者效力更高的问题,各种解释方法没有当然的效力位阶。在刑法解释领域,确定性表现为人们通过诉讼过程就某一刑事案件事实能够得到相对稳定的裁判结论,并且能够预知法律后果;不确定性则表现为人们通过诉讼过程就某一刑事案件事实并不能够确定得到相对稳定的裁判结论,并且难以预知法律后果。虽然刑法解释路径的确定性有其现实基础和制度努力,并存在理论上确定性的应然状态。但在厘清了认识论上的三对概念——偶然与必然、公理与定理、立论与驳论——的问题之后,不确定性的观念开始深入你我内心,并能够合理得出结论:司法语境的四大因素是不确定的,司法中可能出现的案件事实是不确定的,最后的路径选择是不确定的。解释路径的确定性只不过一种理论愿景。社会的大环境,应勇于承担司法人员重新进行路径选择所付出的社会成本。而作为司法人员,应做到坚守正义、和谐司法理念,在诸多不确定性的影响因素中努力寻找到一种相对确定性的解释路径,使之成为经得起历史检验的正义的司法决定或裁判。
[Abstract]:The essence of judicature is under the background of a certain time and space. The subjective of the judiciary is seen in the process of the legal text and the facts of the case and the result of the judgment. Among them, the unauthorized interpretation is the key factor of the judiciary. The four factors of the judicial context, the legal factors, the legal factors, the legal factors, the legal factors and the legal factors are extremely important to the unauthorized interpretation. In the context of judicial practice, the interpretation of criminal law is under the guidance of the spirit, idea and principle of the criminal law, and is influenced by the four factors in the judicial context. The process of concreting the case of the criminal code is made. Judicial practice provides the environment for the interpretation of the criminal law. The interpretation of the criminal law is the main content of the judicial practice. The interpretation of criminal law is the explanation. In judicial practice, the criminal law, which is divorced from judicial practice, explains that its essence is not an interpretation of the act, but a legislative act. It is necessary to explain that the interpretation of the text, the system interpretation, the purpose interpretation and other interpretations can all explain the case to a completely different conclusion. In the field of criminal law interpretation, certainty shows that people can get relatively stable referee conclusions on the facts of a criminal case through litigation process, and can predict the legal consequences in the field of criminal law, and the uncertainty is shown by people in a criminal case through litigation process. The fact is not able to determine a relatively stable conclusion of the referee, and it is difficult to predict the legal consequences. Although the determinacy of the path of interpretation of the criminal law has its realistic basis and institutional efforts, and there is a state of certainty in theory, the three pairs of concepts in the epistemology - contingency and necessity, axiom and theorem, argument and refutation After the problem, the idea of uncertainty begins to go deep into your mind, and can reasonably conclude that the four major factors in the judicial context are uncertain, the facts that may arise in the judiciary are uncertain, the final path is uncertain. The certainty of the interpretation of the path is only a theoretical vision. The social environment, We should bear the courage to bear the social cost of the choice of the judiciary, and as a judicial officer, we should stick to justice and the concept of Harmonious Judicature, and try to find a way of interpretation of a relative certainty among the factors of uncertainty, and make it a judicial decision or referee which is just as a historical test.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】