以宪法之名回归法律文本:德国量刑协商及近期的联邦宪法判例始末

发布时间：2018-06-15 02:05

本文选题：量刑协商 + 认罪认罚从宽　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年05期

【摘要】：在职权主义语境中,德国式辩诉交易是法庭主导下的认罪供述与量刑协商合意,而不包含指控交易和罪状交易。法庭需要查证所有相关的证据方可对被告人定罪量刑。在三起合并审理的宪法诉愿中,联邦宪法法院认定原判违宪,但是否决对《认罪协议法》的合宪性质疑。宪法法院加强对量刑协商的控制力度,强调法庭澄清义务和罪责原则,追加"附条件的无罪宣告"条款。我国在探索和实践具有"控辩协商"因素的认罪认罚从宽制度时,应借鉴德国宪法判例,认真对待既定法律文本,严肃对待诉讼传统;考虑通过合宪性审查逐案统一法律与实践,判决留有废除法律的余地。
[Abstract]:In the context of authoritarianism, German-style plea bargaining is the agreement between confession and sentencing under the guidance of the court, and does not include the charge transaction and the guilt transaction. The court needs to verify all relevant evidence in order to convict and sentence the defendant. In three joint constitutional appeals, the federal constitutional court ruled that the verdict was unconstitutional, but rejected the constitutionality of the plea bargaining Act. The Constitutional Court strengthens the control of sentencing negotiation, emphasizes the principle of clarifying duty and guilt, and adds the clause of "conditional acquittal". In exploring and practicing the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing punishment with the factor of "negotiation between prosecution and defense", our country should draw lessons from the German constitutional jurisprudence, treat the established legal texts seriously and treat the tradition of litigation seriously. Consider unifying law and practice on a case by case basis through constitutionality review, leaving room for repealing the law.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金项目(教外司留[2013]693号)“刑事诉讼行为瑕疵程序性治理研究” 北京市社会科学基金青年项目(15FXC040)“审判中心主义视野下的辩审关系研究”
【分类号】：D951.6;DD911;DD914

【相似文献】