事后抢劫的未遂及中止的认定研究
发布时间:2018-06-15 20:01
本文选题:事后抢劫 + 实行行为 ; 参考:《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:事后抢劫存在未遂形态。事后抢劫中的“犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪”并不意味着行为人在事实上要构成盗窃罪、诈骗罪、抢夺罪,而是意味着行为人有犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺的故意和行为;事后抢劫中暴力或暴力威胁的程度必须与抢劫罪中的暴力、胁迫处于同等的程度,即必须达到足以压制被害人反抗的程度,并且这种暴力或暴力威胁的对象不必是盗窃、诈骗、抢夺的被害人,还可以是目击犯罪行为而追踪来的第三人;事后抢劫中的当场一是指实施盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为的现场,二是指在盗窃等行为的现场或刚一离开该现场就被人及时发现而立即追捕过程中的场所,另外,暴力或暴力威胁行为必须是在“盗窃的机会还在继续中”实施的。事后抢劫的实行行为是行为人为了窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或毁灭罪证而实施的暴力、暴力威胁行为。事后抢劫未遂的认定要分为两种情形,当行为人在前行为中取得财物时,此时重点保护的法益是财产权益,应以是否取得财物为标准;当行为人在前行为中未取得财物时,此时重点保护的法益是人身权益,应以是否造成他人轻伤以上后果为标准。事后抢劫存在预备阶段的中止但是却不具有可罚性。事后抢劫中止的时间条件是行为人当场实施暴力或暴力威胁的过程之中;事后抢劫中止自动性条件是行为人的主观内容是自愿放弃非法占有他人财物或者抗拒抓捕、毁灭罪证的意图,并且在客观上停止了暴力或暴力威胁行为,另外在判断事后抢劫中止的自动性时,应以犯罪中止的法律性质为指导,同时采取逐步判断的方法;事后抢劫中止的有效性条件是行为人自动放弃了暴力、暴力威胁行为,并且以后也不再继续实施,当中止行为与犯罪结果没有发生之间不存在因果关系以及行为人自动放弃了重复的侵害行为时,也成立中止犯。
[Abstract]:The crime of theft , fraud and robbery in post - robbery doesn ' t mean that the perpetrator is in fact guilty of theft , fraud and robbery , but it means that the perpetrator is guilty of theft , fraud and robbery ;
The degree of violence or threat of violence in post - robbery must be equal to the violence and coercion in the crime of robbery , i.e . , to the extent that it is sufficient to suppress the victim ' s resistance , and that such violence or threat of violence does not have to be a victim of theft , fraud , robbery , or a third person who can be traced by a criminal act ;
The act of post - robbery is to be divided into two situations : when the perpetrator acquires property in the former behavior , the law benefits of re - point protection are the property rights and interests and whether the property is obtained as the standard ;
When the perpetrator did not obtain the property in the previous act , the method of re - point protection should be the person ' s rights and interests , which should be based on whether or not the above - mentioned consequences should be caused .
The subjective content of post - robbery suspension is that the actor ' s subjective content is voluntarily giving up illegal possession of his property or resisting arrest , destroying the intent of the crime , and objectively stopping the acts of violence or violence . In addition , it should be guided by the legal nature of the suspension of the crime and adopt a step - by - step judgement when judging the automatic nature of the robbery .
The validity condition of post - robbery suspension is that the perpetrator automatically gives up the violence , acts of violence and no longer continues to implement it , and when the result of the suspension does not have a causal relationship with the result of the crime and the perpetrator automatically gives up the repeated violations , the perpetrator is also established .
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.35
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 龙洋;;论转化型抢劫罪的既遂与未遂形态——从法律拟制的视角[J];河北法学;2009年06期
2 戴有举;转化型抢劫罪若干问题探讨[J];人民检察;2003年02期
3 陈凌;论事后抢劫的既遂与未遂[J];人民检察;2005年21期
4 王世斌;;转化型抢劫罪不应存在未遂形态[J];人民检察;2007年16期
5 李希慧;;抢劫罪的对象、标准及转化问题研究[J];人民检察;2007年18期
6 金坤;;转化型抢劫罪存在未遂形态[J];人民检察;2007年21期
7 章惠萍;转化型抢劫罪成立的条件[J];现代法学;2004年01期
8 李希慧,杜国强;身份犯及其相关概念辨析[J];现代法学;2005年02期
9 谢彤;关于抢劫罪既遂问题的思考[J];政法论丛;2003年06期
,本文编号:2023403
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2023403.html