“临时性强奸案”分析

发布时间：2018-07-01 17:35

本文选题：临时起意 + 量刑　；参考：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2009年,浙江省湖州市南浔区人民法院在审理一起强奸案时,认定两被告人事前无预谋,因此在判决书中使用了“临时性的即意犯罪”一词,对两名被告人酌情从轻处罚。此案一经报道,引起了社会各界的广泛争议。“临时性强奸”一词也由此诞生。数十天后,鉴于舆论的压力,湖州市中级人民法院决定调卷审查并提起再审,最终对本案予以改判。本文将以“临时性强奸”一案为发端,试图回答“究竟如何权衡酌定量刑情节的各种因素,更好的实现刑事司法保障人权和维护社会秩序的价值取向”这一问题。从体例安排来说,本文首先简述“临时性强奸”一案的具体案情和法院的判决结果,介绍了本案的法律争议焦点,进而针对所涉法律问题进行分析探讨。接着以酌定量刑情节的考量为切入点展开论述,找寻我国酌定量刑情节适用中存在的问题,诸如刑事立法上规定模糊、司法实务中普遍忽视和适用随意等。最后笔者将立足于前文剖析出的酌定量刑情节所存在法律问题,以“立法——司法”为分析框架,对我国适用酌定量刑情节的完善提供一些思考和建议。主要包括对于刑事立法中规定模糊等问题,要通过立法上增加概括性条款、将部分酌定量刑情节法定化等措施予以完善；对于司法实务中存在的问题,则需通过建立独立的量刑程序、增强判决书的说理性和提高审判人员的素质等方式来解决。通过这种理论的尝试和建构,笔者仅希望能够为我国的刑事司法的进一步改良和变革提供一份有益的参考。
[Abstract]:In 2009, when the Nanxun District people's Court of Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, tried a rape case, it found that there was no premeditated plan before the personnel of the two defendants, so it used the term "temporary intentional crime" in the judgment, and punished the two defendants as appropriate. Once this case was reported, it caused widespread controversy from all walks of life. The term "temporary rape" also came into being. Decades later, in view of the pressure of public opinion, the Huzhou Intermediate people's Court decided to review the case and file a retrial. This article will start with the case of "temporary rape", and try to answer the question of "how to balance the various factors of discretionary sentencing circumstances, better realize the value orientation of criminal justice to protect human rights and maintain social order". In terms of style arrangement, this paper first briefly describes the specific facts of the case of "temporary rape" and the result of the court judgment, introduces the focus of the legal dispute in this case, and then analyzes and discusses the legal issues involved. Then it discusses the problems in the application of discretionary sentencing circumstances in our country, such as the ambiguity of criminal legislation, the general neglect and arbitrary application in judicial practice and so on. Finally, based on the legal problems in the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, the author provides some thoughts and suggestions on the perfection of the circumstances of discretionary sentencing in our country under the framework of "legislation-judicature". Mainly includes to the criminal legislation in the stipulation ambiguity and so on question, must through the legislation to add the generality clause, the partial discretionary sentencing circumstances legalization and so on measures to be perfected; for the judicial practice existence question, It should be solved by establishing independent sentencing procedure, enhancing the rationality of judgment and improving the quality of judges. Through the attempt and construction of this theory, the author only hopes to provide a useful reference for the further improvement and reform of criminal justice in our country.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】