高速公路冲卡逃费行为之刑法定性研究

发布时间：2018-07-08 11:39

本文选题：高速公路 + 冲卡逃费行为　；参考：《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着经济的快速发展，高速公路也有着快速的发展。目前，我国约有8.5万公里总里程的高速公路，位居世界第二。高速公路发展的同时也伴随着诸多新问题，逃费问题尤为严重。对此，目前我国对高速公路逃费行为无成文刑法加以约束，对逃费行为多要求补缴通行费，情节严重的予以罚款、行政拘留。面对巨大的经济利益，逃费行为人的逃费成本为几乎为零。本文由引言、正文与余论三部分组成。首先，笔者介绍了高速公路冲卡逃费现状及司法实践中对于此种行为的处理情况。其次，归纳介绍了逃费行为的概念、方式，并进而分析了冲卡逃费行为的概念、特征与表现形式。再次，归纳出实践中对此种行为的定性争议，即有罪说与无罪说，并先就无罪说进行分析，进而提出此种观点是不足取的，接下来介绍了有罪说内部的观点争议，并给出自己的评析；最后，从高速公路通行费的性质问题与冲卡逃费行为的行为结构入手，得出笔者的定性观点，即此行为构成抢夺罪。至此，，本文告一段落，笔者在余论部分还提出了一些有待深入探讨的问题，如在遇到具体犯罪的定性难题时，如何在刑法立法论与刑法解释论间进行取舍，对这些问题笔者期待着日后能进行进一步研究。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, the highway also has the fast development. At present, China has about 85000 kilometers of total mileage highway, ranked second in the world. Highway development is accompanied by many new problems, especially the problem of escape fee. In view of this, at present, our country has no written criminal law to restrict the behavior of freeway evading fees, and the behavior of evading fees often requires to pay additional tolls, if the circumstances are serious, fines should be imposed, and administrative detention is required. In the face of huge economic benefits, the cost of evading fees is almost zero. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. First of all, the author introduces the current situation of freeway punching and escaping fee and how to deal with this kind of behavior in judicial practice. Secondly, this paper introduces the concept and mode of fee evasion behavior, and then analyzes the concept, characteristics and manifestation of charge evasion behavior. Thirdly, summarize the qualitative controversy of this kind of behavior in practice, that is, the theory of guilt and innocence, and analyze the theory of innocence first, and then put forward this view is insignificant, and then introduce the internal controversy of the theory of guilt. Finally, starting with the nature of highway tolls and the behavior structure of toll evasion, the author draws the author's qualitative point of view that this behavior constitutes the crime of robbery. At this point, this paper comes to a close, the author also puts forward some questions that need to be discussed deeply, such as how to choose and choose between the theory of criminal law legislation and the theory of explanation of criminal law when confronted with the qualitative problem of specific crime. The author looks forward to further study on these problems in the future.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】