“欠债偿命”的逻辑悖论与刑法危机

发布时间：2019-06-22 16:04

【摘要】："杀人偿命、欠债还钱"的古老格言早已划定了中国死刑适用范围,然而刑法"重刑主义"的毒瘤使集资诈骗罪依然保留了死刑规定,如此泛滥的死刑规定导致难以克服的立法与司法的双重逻辑悖论。刑法作为社会自身的一种存在方式,用之不当会造成新的恶害。因此,对集资诈骗罪过多适用死刑判决将不可避免地使刑法产生空前危机,尤其是突破了主客观相统一的量刑规则,荡涤了刑法谦抑性,使刑法沦为国家强制推行其意志的暴力工具。虽然现阶段全面废除死刑的条件尚未成熟,但是通过对行为人剥夺人身自由和既得利益等措施足以有效地遏制非法集资案件的发生,因而并不妨碍废除集资诈骗罪的死刑规定。
[Abstract]:The ancient adage of "paying one's life and paying off money" has long defined the scope of application of the death penalty in China. However, the cancer of "felony" in the criminal law still retains the death penalty for the crime of fund-raising fraud. Such widespread death penalty provisions lead to the insurmountable dual logical paradox of legislation and judicature. As a way of existence of society itself, criminal law will cause new evil if it is used improperly. Therefore, excessive application of death penalty to the crime of fund-raising fraud will inevitably lead to an unprecedented crisis in criminal law, especially breaking through the unified subjective and objective sentencing rules, cleaning up the modesty of criminal law, and making criminal law become a violent tool for the state to enforce its will. Although the conditions for abolishing the death penalty in an all-round way are not yet ripe at this stage, the measures such as depriving the perpetrator of personal liberty and vested interests are sufficient to effectively curb the occurrence of illegal fund-raising cases, so it does not prevent the abolition of the death penalty for the crime of fund-raising fraud.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“经济赔偿在死刑执行类别选择中影响量子的实证分析与理论研究”(13BFX073) 司法部课题项目“民间融资刑法规制的效果评估及立法建议”(12SFB2023) 西南政法大学重点课题项目“刑民交叉案件法律规制路径之反思与重构——以民间借贷为例”(2013XZYJS002)
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】