当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

民意与舆论对量刑活动的影响

发布时间:2019-06-27 15:13
【摘要】:随着近年来信息传播的便捷、快速化以及民众法律意识的不断增强,民意和舆论对刑事司法活动、特别是量刑活动的影响越来越大。这种影响往往不能避免,且具有一定合理性。通过对比和辨析,我们发现民意与舆论其实是两个有差异性的概念,舆论并不一定代表真实的民意。而只有真实的民意才会对量刑产生积极和正面的影响,所以,要实现公正量刑就必须建立起行之有效的民意收集、筛选机制和舆论引导机制,以保证民意的真实性。 首先,就民意与舆论的概念来说,广义舆论与民意的含义大致相同,本质上均是指民众的意见;而本文所讨论的狭义舆论仅指“媒体舆论”,强调的是媒体在舆论形成中的传播、综合作用。在这个前提下,二者的关系更多的体现为舆论表达并且反作用于民意。具体到刑事司法语境下,二者则更多地体现出刑事相关性。其次,文章通过对民意与舆论影响量刑典型案例的分析,总结出受影响案件的特征,并在受影响与未受影响案例的对比分析中找出限制量刑受民意、舆论影响的因素。再次,在上述案例分析的基础上,分析涉刑民意案例中民意与舆论影响量刑的作用机制、本质和后果,其中,舆论对量刑的影响在很大程度上体现为媒体对量刑的影响。最后,文章在肯定民意与舆论给量刑带来了积极后果的前提下,进一步提出如何规避负面影响以及量刑实践中如何应对民意与舆论的正确措施,具体包括明确民意与舆论适用案件的范围、建立规范化的民意收集、处理制度、建立有效的舆论引导机制以及及时统一的民意与舆论回应机制。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of information transmission in recent years, the influence of public opinion and public opinion on the criminal justice activities, especially the sentencing activities, has become more and more important. This effect is often unavoidable and justified. By contrast and analysis, we find that public opinion and public opinion are actually two different concepts, and public opinion does not necessarily represent the real public opinion. Only the real public opinion will have a positive and positive effect on the sentencing, so it is necessary to establish an effective public opinion collection, screening mechanism and public opinion guiding mechanism to ensure the authenticity of the public opinion. First, in terms of the concept of public opinion and public opinion, the meaning of the general public opinion and the public opinion is generally the same as the public opinion, and the narrow public opinion as discussed herein refers to the "media public opinion" only, and it is emphasized that the media's communication in the formation of public opinion is the comprehensive way On this premise, the relationship between the two is more embodied as the expression of public opinion and the reaction of the people In that context of criminal justice, both of them embody the criminal correlation. Secondly, through the analysis of the typical case of the impact of the public opinion and the public opinion, the article summarizes the characteristics of the affected cases, and finds out the cause of the influence of the public opinion and the public opinion in the comparative analysis of the affected and the non-affected cases. Thirdly, on the basis of the above-mentioned case analysis, the mechanism, nature and consequence of the influence of public opinion and public opinion on the sentencing of public opinion and public opinion are analyzed. In the end, the paper further puts forward how to avoid the negative influence and how to deal with the correct measures of public opinion and public opinion in sentencing practice, including clear public opinion and the case of public opinion application. To set up a standardized public opinion collection and processing system, to establish an effective public opinion guiding mechanism and a timely and unified public opinion and public opinion response machine
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.13

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵秉志;赵书鸿;;公众舆论与量刑政策:影响模式和参与机制[J];法制与社会发展;2008年06期

2 上海市金山区人民法院和人民法院报社联合课题组;张斌;倪寿明;王庆廷;;个案处理中的民意与司法——以50个联名信刑事案例为考察样本[J];人民司法;2012年01期

3 刘倩;邹丽;;民意与法意的碰撞与耦合——以检察机关和舆论媒体的互动与应对为视角[J];陕西行政学院学报;2013年01期

4 胡翼青;;如何辨别民意真假[J];人民论坛;2011年16期

5 苏力;;法条主义、民意与难办案件[J];中外法学;2009年01期

6 孙万怀;;论民意在刑事司法中的解构[J];中外法学;2011年01期

7 汪明亮;;媒体对定罪量刑活动可能带来负面影响的作用机制[J];现代法学;2006年06期

8 王来华,林竹,毕宏音;对舆情、民意和舆论三概念异同的初步辨析[J];新视野;2004年05期

9 阮云志;;社会舆论概念的舛误与正解[J];新西部(下半月);2008年06期

10 孙笑侠,熊静波;判决与民意——兼比较考察中美法官如何对待民意[J];政法论坛;2005年05期



本文编号:2506905

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2506905.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7baea***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com