论过失犯的实行行为

发布时间：2019-07-08 18:52

【摘要】：在我国,过失犯罪,无论是在刑法立法例上或是刑法理论上,因其与故意犯罪的实行行为纠缠不清,成立与否很大程度上依附着实害结果的发生。且几乎是,实害结果发生后,一旦能够认定行为人主观上存有过失,即成立过失犯罪。在中国社会经历深刻变革的背景下,上述的过失犯构造已经难以发挥犯罪构成要件的机能,不当地扩大了过失犯罪的处罚范围。与此同时,我国耦合式犯罪构成要件中的危害行为,其定义与其他构成要件循环往复,逻辑混乱,未能给构造过失行为预留足够的空间。过失犯罪的独立,与德日刑法中行为理论的演变密不可分。目的行为论的诞生,标志着客观不法、主观罪责二元体系的崩溃,过失不再单纯地存在于责任阶段,构成要件、违法性阶段也受其影响。据此,以注意义务为核心的过失犯构造得到广泛的认可。随着对因果关系难题的深入研究,旨在解决过失犯罪的客观归责理论,其自身的逻辑框架也愈发精确,发展成为一个与主观归责相对应的、涵盖犯罪构成、因果关系及不法评价的客观归责体系。本文分为三章,旨趣系构建过失犯罪的实行行为,故过失犯罪与犯罪行为理论的介绍自不可少。第一章承担了简述过失犯罪和犯罪行为理论的任务,同时剖析国内外的行为理论,说明行为概念应当承担的基本功能。之后,则需进一步探讨过失犯罪的实行行为样态,这便是第二章的主要内容。第二章负责介绍并评析德日四种典型的过失犯构造学说,阐明各学说对过失犯实行行为认定的标准及其优劣,并主要分析新过失论与客观归责理论。第三章则在前述两章的基础上,构建我国过失犯实行行为的认定标准。
[Abstract]:In our country, negligence crime, whether in criminal law legislation or criminal law theory, because it is entangled with the implementation of intentional crime, whether it is established or not depends on the occurrence of the result of actual harm to a large extent. And almost, after the result of the actual harm, once the perpetrator can be identified subjective fault, that is, the establishment of negligence crime. Under the background of profound changes in Chinese society, the above structure of negligence crime has been difficult to give full play to the function of the constituent elements of crime, and the scope of punishment for negligence crime has been improperly expanded. At the same time, the definition of harmful behavior in the constituent elements of coupled crime in our country goes back and forth with other constituent elements, and the logic is confused, which fails to reserve enough space for structural negligence. The independence of negligence crime is closely related to the evolution of behavior theory in German and Japanese criminal law. The birth of the theory of objective behavior marks the collapse of the dualistic system of objective illegality and subjective criminal responsibility. Negligence no longer simply exists in the stage of responsibility, but also affects the stage of illegality. Therefore, the structure of negligence crime with the duty of care as the core has been widely recognized. With the in-depth study of causality, the objective imputation theory to solve the problem of negligence crime, its own logical framework has become more and more accurate, and has developed into an objective imputation system corresponding to subjective imputation, covering the constitution of crime, causality and illegal evaluation. This paper is divided into three chapters, the purport is to construct the implementation of negligence crime, so the introduction of negligence crime and criminal behavior theory is indispensable. The first chapter undertakes the task of briefly describing the theory of negligence crime and criminal behavior, and analyzes the behavior theory at home and abroad, and explains the basic functions that the concept of behavior should undertake. After that, it is necessary to further explore the behavior of negligence crime, which is the main content of the second chapter. The second chapter is responsible for introducing and evaluating the four typical theories of negligence in Germany and Japan, expounding the standards and advantages and disadvantages of each theory in identifying the behavior of negligence, and mainly analyzing the new theory of negligence and the theory of objective imputation. The third chapter, on the basis of the above two chapters, constructs the identification standard of the behavior of delinquent crime in our country.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】