条件说的厘清与辩驳
发布时间：2019-07-29 09:31
【摘要】：作为刑法因果关系领域的通说理论,条件说受到了条件说无用论、条件说错误论以及条件说宽松论的批评,但这些批评意见都难以成立。是否有助于查明因果关系,并不是评价包括条件说在内的刑法因果关系理论的合理标准。条件公式的确会在假定因果关系和择一因果关系的场合得出错误结论,但条件公式不等于条件说判断公式,而条件说判断公式可以在上述两种场合得出正确结论。条件说可以区分为积极条件说和消极条件说,积极条件说的确存在过于宽松的问题,但目前在理论上占据通说地位的消极条件说并不存在这个问题。
[Abstract]:As a general theory in the field of causality in criminal law, conditional theory has been criticized by the useless theory of conditional theory, the erroneous theory of conditional theory and the theory of leniency of conditional theory, but these criticisms are difficult to hold. Whether it is helpful to find out causality is not a reasonable standard to evaluate the theory of causality in criminal law, including conditional theory. The conditional formula does draw the wrong conclusion on the assumption of causality and the optional causality, but the conditional formula is not equal to the conditional judgment formula, and the conditional formula can draw the correct conclusion in the above two situations. Conditional theory can be divided into positive condition theory and negative condition theory. Positive condition theory does have the problem of too loose, but at present, the negative condition theory, which occupies the general position in theory, does not have this problem.
【作者单位】： 天津财经大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部2016年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目一般项目“正当化事由的理论建构与司法适用研究”(编号:16SFB2020)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2520417
[Abstract]:As a general theory in the field of causality in criminal law, conditional theory has been criticized by the useless theory of conditional theory, the erroneous theory of conditional theory and the theory of leniency of conditional theory, but these criticisms are difficult to hold. Whether it is helpful to find out causality is not a reasonable standard to evaluate the theory of causality in criminal law, including conditional theory. The conditional formula does draw the wrong conclusion on the assumption of causality and the optional causality, but the conditional formula is not equal to the conditional judgment formula, and the conditional formula can draw the correct conclusion in the above two situations. Conditional theory can be divided into positive condition theory and negative condition theory. Positive condition theory does have the problem of too loose, but at present, the negative condition theory, which occupies the general position in theory, does not have this problem.
【作者单位】： 天津财经大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部2016年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目一般项目“正当化事由的理论建构与司法适用研究”(编号:16SFB2020)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 蒋涛;崔佳;;论刑法上因果关系——条件说与相当因果关系说[J];科技风;2010年05期
2 汤泽利;;因果关系判断的理论转向[J];法制与社会;2014年08期
3 乔焕春;;我对我的爱人是怎样由嫌弃转变为团结和睦相亲相爱的——土产公司乔焕春的自述[J];黑龙江政报;1953年03期
4 闫国智;法律关系主体资格浅议──“两条件说”评析[J];政法论丛;1996年04期
5 王志远;;实质违法观的续造:客观归责理论的真正贡献[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2011年03期
6 邹兵建;;论刑法归因与归责关系的嬗变[J];刑事法评论;2012年02期
7 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 王琳;司法改革“激进”还是“渐进”[N];检察日报;2001年
，本文编号：2520417
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2520417.html
