公共政策属性导向的城市总体规划实施评估研究
发布时间:2018-03-19 06:43
本文选题:规划评估 切入点:公共政策 出处:《苏州科技学院》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:经历了几十年的高速发展,我国的城市建设开始趋于理性,,城市转入内涵发展阶段,由原先的重“量”发展转向重“质”的发展,开始反思城市建设的成效。总体规划不再是专注于物质空间设计的技术蓝图,而是协调各方发展需求、调配城市空间资源的公共政策,其公共政策属性得到越来越多的认同。但目前的总体规划实施评估实践更多地立足技术层面,对总体规划实施情况进行总结和评价,在很大程度上忽视了总体规划的公共政策属性。这种评估的结果并不能真正反映总体规划在城市发展与建设中的地位、作用和内涵。本文以总体规划的公共政策属性为导向,尝试构建一套包括方案评估、过程评估和实施评估的针对总体规划全过程的评估体系。 首先,在吸收和借鉴西方公共政策评估的理论和实践基础上,梳理了城市规划理论的发展与规划评估实践的过程和阶段,总结了国内规划评估理论探索和实践的发展。其次,通过总体规划公共政策属性的解读,指出了目前总体规划编制和管理实践的“公共性”和“政策性”转向,和总体规划实施评估中存在的问题,认为目前我国规划评估参与主体的公众性不足、评估内容的公共政策属性体现不足。第三,基于公共政策属性,论文建构了以公共政策属性为导向的总体规划实施评估体系,并针对方案评估、实施过程评估和实施效果评估分别建立了评估指标体系。最后,论文选取无锡市总体规划实施评估实践,分析其实施评估方案中的不足,结合本文所构建的评估体系提出了相应的优化建议。
[Abstract]:After decades of rapid development, the urban construction in our country began to be rational, and the city turned to the stage of intension development, from the development of "quantity" to the development of "quality". Starting to reflect on the effectiveness of urban construction. The master plan is no longer a technical blueprint focused on material space design, but a public policy to coordinate the development needs of all parties and allocate urban space resources. Its public policy attributes are more and more recognized. However, the current practice of overall planning implementation evaluation is based more on the technical level, and summarizes and evaluates the implementation of the overall plan. To a great extent, the public policy attribute of master plan is neglected. The result of this kind of evaluation can not really reflect the position, function and connotation of master plan in urban development and construction. This paper is guided by the public policy attribute of master plan. This paper attempts to construct an evaluation system for the whole process of overall planning, including scheme evaluation, process evaluation and implementation evaluation. Firstly, on the basis of absorbing and drawing lessons from the theory and practice of western public policy evaluation, this paper combs the development of urban planning theory and the process and stage of planning evaluation practice, summarizes the development of domestic planning evaluation theory and practice. Through the interpretation of the attributes of the general planning public policy, the paper points out the "public" and "policy" turn of the overall planning and management practice, and the problems existing in the evaluation of the overall planning implementation. The author thinks that the public nature of the participants in the planning evaluation is insufficient, and the public policy attribute of the evaluation content is insufficient. Thirdly, based on the public policy attribute, the paper constructs the evaluation system of the overall planning implementation oriented by the public policy attribute. Finally, the paper selects Wuxi City master plan implementation evaluation practice, analyzes the shortcomings of its implementation evaluation scheme. Combined with the evaluation system constructed in this paper, the corresponding optimization suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:苏州科技学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TU984.11
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孔昭林;论公共政策在公共行政中的科学定位[J];北京联合大学学报;2001年02期
2 冯雨峰;从目标规划到过程规划——城市规划的技术特征与政策特征[J];城市发展研究;2003年03期
3 徐煜辉;徐嘉;李旭;;宜居城市视角下中小城市总体规划实施评价体系构建——以重庆市万州区为例[J];城市发展研究;2010年02期
4 韦梦濵;;城市总体规划实施评估的内容探讨[J];城市发展研究;2010年04期
5 孙施文;有关城市规划实施的基础研究[J];城市规划;2000年07期
6 汪光焘;以科学发展观和正确政绩观重新审视城乡规划工作[J];城市规划;2004年03期
7 石楠;试论城市规划中的公共利益[J];城市规划;2004年06期
8 汪光焘;认真研究改进城乡规划工作[J];城市规划;2004年11期
9 柳意云,闫小培;转型时期城市总体规划的思考[J];城市规划;2004年11期
10 荣西武,李铁,赵荣山;小城镇规划编制与实施评价体系研究[J];城市规划;2005年10期
本文编号:1633254
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/chengjian/1633254.html