地震作用下钢管混凝土格构式高墩—桁式梁轻型桥粱行车安全性分析
[Abstract]:Concrete-filled steel tubular latticed high piers-truss beam light bridge is a new type of composite bridge. As the first bridge of this type in China, the proportion of live load and dead load of Qianhaizi Bridge is larger than that of ordinary bridge. At the same time, the bridge pier is long, the structure is novel and the structure is complex, which makes the seismic performance of the bridge different from that of the ordinary composite structure. Because the bridge is located in the transition zone from strong earthquake to weak earthquake, the earthquake intensity is large. Under the action of strong earthquake, the bridge may cause excessive displacement and vibration of the main beam and affect the safety of the driving vehicle. Therefore, the dynamic response of vehicle-bridge of Qianhaizi Bridge under earthquake is analyzed in this paper, and the driving safety of high-pier bridge under earthquake is discussed. The main work and conclusions are as follows: (1) based on the coupled motion equation of vehicle-bridge interaction considering road roughness and considering the effect of seismic load, the coupling calculation method of vehicle-bridge interaction under earthquake action is established. The coupling calculation method of vehicle-bridge interaction under earthquake action is added to the developed program NL_Beam3D. The coupling calculation of vehicle-bridge system interaction under seismic action is realized. (2) the results are compared with those of real bridge load test and seismic simulation shaking table scale model test. The results show that the vibration modes obtained by finite element analysis are consistent with those obtained by two tests. The in-plane, out-of-plane fundamental frequencies obtained by finite element analysis are close to those obtained by experiments, and the error is less than 5%. Under the action of moving vehicle, the finite element calculation results of the dynamic deflection of the chord under the 20th span main girder are close to the measured values of the real bridge load test, and the shape of the displacement time history curve obtained by the finite element calculation of the bridge under the E1 earthquake is consistent with that of the shaking table test. The measured displacement amplitude and the theoretical displacement amplitude approximately satisfy the similarity ratio of 1 / 82, thus confirming the correctness of the calculation method and the program developed in this paper. (3) the E1 earthquake is input in the most disadvantageous direction. The bridge is mainly based on the first several transversal symmetrical vibration modes. Using the vehicle roll index to evaluate the driving safety, it can be seen that the maximum lateral acceleration of the bridge is less than the threshold value of the vehicle overturning index, so the vehicles travelling on the bridge under E1 earthquake will not roll; The corresponding maximum displacement of the piers is compared with the limit of H / 300 specified in the guidelines for the Design and Construction of concrete filled Steel Tube Bridges, except for the 8# piers. The rest of the piers can meet the requirements. (4) the traffic safety of Qianhaizi Bridge is analyzed by increasing the earthquake intensity step by step. The results show that, first, when the peak ground acceleration PGA is 0.17g (E1 ground motion) and 0.26g (1.53E1 earthquake), the lateral displacement of the piers exceeds the limit of H / 300, but the heavy truck does not roll. Heavy goods vehicles may be capsized first, The PGA of the two combinations are 0.23g (1.35 times E1) and 0.32g (1.88% E1) respectively. The ratio of transverse displacement to height of pier is 1 / 178 and 1 / 198, respectively, which is greater than the limit stipulated in the guidelines for the Design and Construction of concrete filled Steel Tube Bridges. The value of 1 / 300 indicates that the guide limits the pier top displacement more strictly.
【学位授予单位】:福州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TU398.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 毋剑平,白雪霜,孙建华;不同设计使用年限下地震作用的确定方法[J];工程抗震;2003年02期
2 李剑;陈岱林;;地震作用最大方向的确定[J];建筑科学;2005年06期
3 江德保;顾晓静;;不同设计使用年限下地震作用取值分析与建议[J];工程建设与设计;2007年04期
4 王宗策;;地震作用力的数学力学计算分析[J];科技风;2008年14期
5 吴鹏飞;曹加良;;地震作用及其确定理论[J];科技信息;2009年10期
6 欧进萍,段宇博,刘会仪;结构随机地震作用及其统计参数[J];哈尔滨建筑工程学院学报;1994年05期
7 李明惠;框架在地震作用下考虑扭转影响的计算[J];机械设计;1995年12期
8 杨翠如;国际标准《结构地震作用》简介[J];工程抗震;1995年01期
9 符圣聪,林平,江静贝;重要工程的地震作用取值[J];工程抗震;2003年01期
10 王俭,王伟,王中华;地震作用下土与结构物相互作用机理分析探讨[J];房材与应用;2003年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 赵成刚;尹之潜;;以概率理论为基础的地震作用与其它荷载的组合计算[A];工程结构可靠性——中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程学会第七届学术会议论文集[C];1987年
2 周乾;闫维明;纪金豹;;地震作用下浮放物体摇晃响应仿真分析[A];第十届全国冲击动力学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年
3 戴秋云;;在地震作用下核电站结构可靠性评价[A];工程结构可靠性——中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程学会第七届学术会议论文集[C];1987年
4 杨成;高夕良;李力;赵世春;张光辉;李英民;;大型火车站台结构的地震作用下扭转不规则分析[A];第八届全国地震工程学术会议论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2010年
5 张誉;王卫;;双向地震作用下不规则框架的扭转分析[A];第三届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(下)[C];1994年
6 唐凤乾;赵均;;屋顶塔上微波天线的地震作用计算[A];第七届全国现代结构工程学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
7 侯杰;;地震作用下砖砌墙体倒塌分析[A];汶川地震建筑震害调查与灾后重建分析报告[C];2008年
8 胡盈辉;庄茁;由小川;;大型储液罐在地震作用下的附加质量法研究[A];北京力学会第十六届学术年会论文集[C];2010年
9 吴波;欧进萍;;在多次地震作用下结构概率累积损伤初探[A];工程结构可靠性——中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程学会结构可靠度委员会全国第三届学术交流会议论文集[C];1992年
10 蔡新;李益;吴威;叶松;;地震作用下堤防风险分析研究[A];现代水利水电工程抗震防灾研究与进展(2011年)[C];2011年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王朋;双向地震作用下高层建筑混合结构抗震性能及损伤模式研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2015年
2 高霖;地面式钢筋混凝土水池自愈、渗漏试验及地震响应分析[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2015年
3 崔丽丽;基于唯象模型的梁式桥地震碰撞分析及抗震性能研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 任辰昊;单双向地震作用下框架—核心筒结构滞回耗能研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2015年
2 沙峰;地震作用下车—桥空间耦合系统动力响应分析[D];苏州大学;2015年
3 王涛;大型落地式钢板仓地震作用分析[D];山东大学;2015年
4 管英s,
本文编号:2140920
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/chengjian/2140920.html