不同背景建筑大师创作的三个博馆建筑的分析与评价
发布时间：2019-03-07 18:21
【摘要】：自1978年十一届三中全会召开以来,中国建筑行业高速发展。但纵观这30多年来中国的新建筑成果,大多呈现“高开低走”的状况,鲜有精品项目。 真实存在的建筑,不仅能在一定程度上反映建筑师的设计思想,也反映了社会建筑环境的整体特征。在中国建筑发展的现状下,通过对“同时、同地”,不同背景建筑师设计的同类型建筑的梳理、剖析与横向比较,不仅能学习不同背景建筑师对于“此时此地”不同的设计理念与方法；也能叹息国内当下建筑环境的整体特征,找到部分与建筑业发达国家之间的差异；还看到建筑对城市的社会、文化生活的影响。 为“以小见大”,真实可信地反映上述问题,本文尝试用“切片”的形式,选取相似时间在杭州建成的,由不同背景建筑师所设计的三个博物馆：浙江美术馆、良渚博物院和湿地博物馆作为具体研究对象,以一种局外的立场和对比交叉的视角,尽量客观真实地对三个建筑为基础,对问题进行解读。 文章虽不能面面俱到,但希望通过论文,不仅能完善三个博物馆的资料,学习三位建筑师的设计理论和手法,还能对当下建筑环境的特征有客观的洞悉,并为中国建筑未来的发展方向提供可借鉴的思路。
[Abstract]:Since the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee was held in 1978, China's construction industry has developed at a high speed. But throughout these 30 years of new construction achievements in China, most of the "high open and low walk" situation, few high-quality projects. The real architecture not only reflects the architect's design idea to a certain extent, but also reflects the overall characteristics of the social architectural environment. Under the present situation of the development of Chinese architecture, through combing, analyzing and comparing the same type of architecture designed by the architects of different backgrounds, "at the same time, in the same place", Not only can learn different background architects to "here and now" different design ideas and methods; We can also sigh the overall characteristics of the current domestic architectural environment, find some differences with the developed countries in the construction industry, but also see the impact of architecture on the city's social and cultural life. In order to "see the whole through a small part" and truly and reliably reflect the above-mentioned problems, this paper attempts to use the form of "slicing" to select three museums designed by architects of different backgrounds in Hangzhou: Zhejiang Art Museum, which was built in Hangzhou at a similar time. Liangzhu Museum and Wetland Museum, as specific research objects, interpret the problems objectively and truthfully on the basis of an out-of-local stand and a crosscutting angle of contrast, as far as possible, on the basis of objective and real understanding of the three buildings. Although the article can not be comprehensive, but I hope that through the paper, not only can perfect the data of the three museums, learn the design theory and techniques of the three architects, but also can have an objective insight into the characteristics of the current architectural environment. And for the future development direction of Chinese architecture can be used for reference.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：TU242.5
本文编号：2436337
[Abstract]:Since the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee was held in 1978, China's construction industry has developed at a high speed. But throughout these 30 years of new construction achievements in China, most of the "high open and low walk" situation, few high-quality projects. The real architecture not only reflects the architect's design idea to a certain extent, but also reflects the overall characteristics of the social architectural environment. Under the present situation of the development of Chinese architecture, through combing, analyzing and comparing the same type of architecture designed by the architects of different backgrounds, "at the same time, in the same place", Not only can learn different background architects to "here and now" different design ideas and methods; We can also sigh the overall characteristics of the current domestic architectural environment, find some differences with the developed countries in the construction industry, but also see the impact of architecture on the city's social and cultural life. In order to "see the whole through a small part" and truly and reliably reflect the above-mentioned problems, this paper attempts to use the form of "slicing" to select three museums designed by architects of different backgrounds in Hangzhou: Zhejiang Art Museum, which was built in Hangzhou at a similar time. Liangzhu Museum and Wetland Museum, as specific research objects, interpret the problems objectively and truthfully on the basis of an out-of-local stand and a crosscutting angle of contrast, as far as possible, on the basis of objective and real understanding of the three buildings. Although the article can not be comprehensive, but I hope that through the paper, not only can perfect the data of the three museums, learn the design theory and techniques of the three architects, but also can have an objective insight into the characteristics of the current architectural environment. And for the future development direction of Chinese architecture can be used for reference.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：TU242.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 李姝;彭一刚;蔡镇钰;崔恺;姜维;赵小钧;柳冠中;;中国建筑师 VS 境外建筑师——由国家大剧院引发的思考[J];城市环境设计;2004年01期
2 贺勇;;也说建筑评价与中国特色[J];建筑学报;2008年08期
3 薛求理;;输入外国建筑设计30年[J];建筑学报;2009年05期
4 程泰宁;王大鹏;;通感·意象·建构——浙江美术馆建筑创作后记[J];建筑学报;2010年06期
5 王晖;陈帆;;写意与几何——对比浙江美术馆和苏州博物馆[J];建筑学报;2010年06期
6 庄惟敏;;做一个使设计成为创作的职业建筑师:读张饮楠先生《特色取胜》有感[J];建筑创作;2006年03期
7 姜涌;;职业与执业 中外建筑师之辨[J];时代建筑;2007年02期
8 余琪;;关于建筑师职业身份认同的调查报告[J];时代建筑;2007年02期
，本文编号：2436337
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/chengjian/2436337.html
