工程争端影响因素及争端预防研究
发布时间:2019-04-23 23:55
【摘要】:工程项目建设过程中,工程纠纷基本上是不可避免的,由于人们的立场不同,对于工程争端的认知存在较大的差异,故而容易上升为工程争端或者工程诉讼。发生工程争端后,项目相关参与方为了应对工程争端,通常会需要花费大量的争端费用,而且项目相关参与方未必能够赞同工程争端的裁决结果,影响了项目的顺利实施和双方的利益。大量的案例和文献表明,某些因素对于引发工程争端起到极为重要的作用,通过建立工程争端预测模型,预测工程是否会发生争端,并针对可能发生争端的项目,分析导致工程争端发生的主要因素,采取合理有效的管理与控制措施,能够在一定程度上降低工程争端发生的概率和损失。本文搜集和整理工程争端案例,通过对引起工程争端的某些主要因素,如业主和承包商的管理与组织、双方的关系价值、项目的规模与复杂性、资金计划、合同与风险管理以及项目的范围定义等,进行分析后,将其归结为过程、人员以及项目三类因素,并针对能够引发工程争端的要素设计相应的调查问卷。利用网络和现场发放的形式收集和整理调查问卷,并对数据进行因子分析,提取了9个因子,据此建立了工程争端预测模型,并通过实例对工程争端预测模型进行验证,模型得到较可靠验证。工程争端潜在指数的模型能够帮助工程项目管理人员在工程项目开始阶段和随后的履行合同过程中,认识到产生工程争端的潜在因素,从合同公平和公正的角度,发现产生争端的深层次原因,并引导签约双方改进约定和建立更和谐的关系,营造良好的工程实施环境,达成双赢的局面。
[Abstract]:In the course of construction of engineering projects, engineering disputes are basically inevitable. Because of different positions of people, there are great differences in cognition of engineering disputes, so it is easy to rise to engineering disputes or engineering litigation. After a project dispute occurs, the project participants usually need to spend a lot of costs in order to deal with the project dispute, and the project participants may not be able to agree with the outcome of the project dispute decision. Affected the smooth implementation of the project and the interests of both sides. A large number of cases and literature have shown that certain factors play a very important role in the initiation of engineering disputes, by establishing a prediction model for engineering disputes, predicting whether a project will occur disputes, and aiming at projects where disputes may arise, By analyzing the main factors leading to the occurrence of engineering disputes and taking reasonable and effective management and control measures, the probability and loss of the occurrence of engineering disputes can be reduced to a certain extent. This paper collects and collates the cases of engineering disputes, through the management and organization of the owners and contractors, the value of the relationship between the two sides, the scale and complexity of the project, the capital plan, and the management and organization of the owners and contractors. Contract and risk management as well as the definition of project scope are analyzed and summarized into three kinds of factors: process, personnel and project. A questionnaire is designed for the factors that can lead to engineering disputes. The questionnaire is collected and sorted out in the form of network and on-the-spot distribution, and nine factors are extracted from the data by factor analysis. Based on this, a project dispute prediction model is established and verified by an example. The model is proved to be reliable. A model of the potential index of engineering disputes can help project managers recognize the underlying factors that give rise to engineering disputes in the initial phase of the project and the subsequent performance of the contract, from the perspective of fairness and fairness of the contract, Find out the deep causes of the dispute, and guide the two parties to improve the agreement and establish a more harmonious relationship, create a good project implementation environment, and achieve a win-win situation.
【学位授予单位】:天津大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TU71
本文编号:2463922
[Abstract]:In the course of construction of engineering projects, engineering disputes are basically inevitable. Because of different positions of people, there are great differences in cognition of engineering disputes, so it is easy to rise to engineering disputes or engineering litigation. After a project dispute occurs, the project participants usually need to spend a lot of costs in order to deal with the project dispute, and the project participants may not be able to agree with the outcome of the project dispute decision. Affected the smooth implementation of the project and the interests of both sides. A large number of cases and literature have shown that certain factors play a very important role in the initiation of engineering disputes, by establishing a prediction model for engineering disputes, predicting whether a project will occur disputes, and aiming at projects where disputes may arise, By analyzing the main factors leading to the occurrence of engineering disputes and taking reasonable and effective management and control measures, the probability and loss of the occurrence of engineering disputes can be reduced to a certain extent. This paper collects and collates the cases of engineering disputes, through the management and organization of the owners and contractors, the value of the relationship between the two sides, the scale and complexity of the project, the capital plan, and the management and organization of the owners and contractors. Contract and risk management as well as the definition of project scope are analyzed and summarized into three kinds of factors: process, personnel and project. A questionnaire is designed for the factors that can lead to engineering disputes. The questionnaire is collected and sorted out in the form of network and on-the-spot distribution, and nine factors are extracted from the data by factor analysis. Based on this, a project dispute prediction model is established and verified by an example. The model is proved to be reliable. A model of the potential index of engineering disputes can help project managers recognize the underlying factors that give rise to engineering disputes in the initial phase of the project and the subsequent performance of the contract, from the perspective of fairness and fairness of the contract, Find out the deep causes of the dispute, and guide the two parties to improve the agreement and establish a more harmonious relationship, create a good project implementation environment, and achieve a win-win situation.
【学位授予单位】:天津大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TU71
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘锐;吕文学;严谦;;基于共享心智模型的工程项目知识管理[J];工程管理学报;2014年02期
2 柯洪;吕廷竹;杜亚灵;;基于SEM的工程合同不完备性测度研究[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2014年02期
3 寿涌毅;车文;彭晓峰;;基于内容分析法的大型项目特征研究[J];项目管理技术;2013年06期
4 何清华;罗岚;陆云波;任俊山;;基于TO视角的项目复杂性测度研究[J];管理工程学报;2013年01期
5 唐海荣;尹贻林;侯春梅;朱成爱;;工程量清单项目特征描述不准确导致结算纠纷的预控措施研究[J];工程管理学报;2012年05期
6 吴光东;施建刚;唐代中;;工程项目团队动态特征、冲突维度与项目成功关系实证[J];管理工程学报;2012年04期
7 滕延京;宫剑飞;李建民;;基础工程技术发展综述[J];土木工程学报;2012年05期
8 韩姣杰;周国华;李延来;蔡屹;;基于互惠偏好的多主体参与项目团队合作行为[J];系统管理学报;2012年01期
9 应志刚;;建筑企业项目管理创新研究与实践[J];工程管理学报;2011年04期
10 王雪青;宋研;;基于代建机制的大型项目组织机构设计研究[J];项目管理技术;2011年07期
,本文编号:2463922
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/chengjian/2463922.html