云服务提供商避风港规则适用研究

发布时间：2018-02-16 03:47

本文关键词： 避风港规则云计算云服务　出处：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：云计算既是技术又是商业模式，从技术而言，云计算把各种软硬件资源进行整合形成一个完整的计算资源池，然后通过一个统一的界面调节配置资源以满足用户的各种不同需求；而从商业模式角度而言，云服务商为用户提供可以随时获取、动态化、可扩展、按需使用、按使用付费的新的资源利用模式。云计算给作品的创作、传播和利用提供了新的模式，对信息资源的产生和分配提供了新的可能，从而给著作权制度带来了新的挑战。避风港规则作为调整网络版权侵权确认与侵权抗辩规则，在云计算环境下，也产生了诸多不同于传统网络环境下的适用问题。首先，终止用户重复侵权政策的实施对象难以区分。云用户在利用云服务过程中所持有的主观心理状态的不同，难以通用该规则终止所有云用户的账户，譬如对侵权作品的传播与利用不具有主观认知的云用户，则不应一律终止其用户账号；其次，通知删除规则的适用范围受到限制。公有云与私有云具有不同特征，私有云的私有功能使得版权人难以穿透防火墙监控发现侵权作品，而删除规则的适用前提，即接触作品成为虚设；再者，云服务提供商“红旗标准”的优先适用问题，尤其是针对不同的商业模式，如何判断云服务商的营利方式与经营宗旨；最后，云服务提供商替代责任的承担问题，云计算与大数据环境下，要求更高的网络安全性，对云服务商的网络监管与控制权利和能力都提出了新的要求。权利的实现包括确权和侵权救济两个阶段。在云计算产业蓬勃发展的大环境下，如何利用避风港规则维持多方利益的平衡，既促进技术、产业的长足健康发展，又能合理的保障版权人的权益成为迫切解决的议题。进一步明确不同云服务主体在具体适用避风港规则中的不同条件，结合利用明知标准与红旗标准对云服务商的主观认知状态进行判断，适当扩展删除侵权作品的范围，，以及强制云服务商采用标准技术措施，将完善避风港规则，以迎接云计算所带来的诸多挑战。
[Abstract]:Cloud computing is both a technology and a business model. In terms of technology, cloud computing integrates all kinds of software and hardware resources into a complete pool of computing resources. Then through a unified interface to adjust the allocation of resources to meet the different needs of users; and from a business model perspective, cloud service providers provide users with ready access, dynamic, extensible, on demand, Cloud computing provides a new model for the creation, dissemination and utilization of works, provides new possibilities for the generation and distribution of information resources, and brings new challenges to the copyright system. In cloud computing environment, the rule of safe haven, which is used to adjust the rules of confirming and defending the infringement of copyright infringement on the network, has also produced many problems that are different from those in the traditional network environment. First of all, It is difficult to distinguish the object of the policy. The cloud users hold different subjective psychological state in the process of using the cloud service, so it is difficult to use this rule to terminate the accounts of all cloud users. For example, cloud users who do not have subjective knowledge about the dissemination and use of infringing works should not all terminate their user accounts. Secondly, the scope of application of notice deletion rules is restricted. Public clouds and private clouds have different characteristics. The private function of the private cloud makes it difficult for the copyright owner to monitor and discover the infringing work through the firewall, and the applicable premise of the deletion rule is that contact with the work becomes fictitious; moreover, the cloud service provider's "Red Flag Standard" has priority to apply. Especially for different business models, how to judge the cloud service provider's profit mode and business purpose; finally, cloud service provider's assumption of alternative responsibility, cloud computing and big data environment, require higher network security, The network supervision and control rights and capabilities of cloud service providers are put forward new requirements. The realization of right includes two stages: confirming right and tort relief. In the environment of cloud computing industry booming development, how to use the rules of safe haven to maintain the balance of various interests, both to promote the rapid and healthy development of technology and industry, It has become an urgent issue to protect the rights and interests of copyright owners reasonably. It is further clear that different cloud service providers have different conditions for the specific application of the safe haven rules. Combining with the criteria of knowledge and red flag to judge the subjective cognitive state of cloud service providers, appropriately expanding the scope of deleting infringing works, and forcing cloud service providers to adopt standard technical measures, the rules of safe haven will be perfected. To meet the challenges of cloud computing.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：TP393.09

【相似文献】