网络空间安全的权力建构

发布时间：2018-04-16 09:13

本文选题：网络空间 + 网络安全　；参考：《国防科学技术大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：习主席指出,没有网络安全就没有国家安全,没有信息化就没有现代化。随着科技发展,网络空间在现代文明中的地位越来越突出,网络空间安全备受瞩目。网络空间作为一个全新的人造技术域,在其建构过程中既有来自物理域的技术支持,又有来自认知域的观念支撑,因而,网络空间安全应综合考虑网络空间的物理域和认知域,具体可以分为网络基础安全,网络空间行为有序以及网络空间利益分配合理三重含义。要保证网络空间安全,除了从技术上加强网络空间的物理安全外,还需要通过认知域的观念建构,来塑造有利于网络空间安全的权力结构。现实建构主义承认真实世界的存在,同时强调观念对社会结构的建构作用,与网络空间天生具有契合性。从现实建构主义出发,对网络空间社会结构进行研究,具有现实性和可行性。现实建构主义提供了四种权力形式。然而在网络空间联系频繁的条件下,这四种形式显得过于繁杂,不利于有效把握网络空间权力结构。借助建构主义创始人之一亚历山大·温特对认同过程划分的三个层次:强制、利我以及合法性,通过网络空间行为体对身份的认知,可以将网络空间中的权力分为影响行为体思维模式的程序性权力、威胁进行惩罚的结构性权力和引诱合作获利的资源性权力。当前网络空间中三种权力的分布虽然暂时基本保证了网络空间的稳定,但并未建构出一个有利于网络空间长期发展和安全的权力结构,随着时间的推移,当前网络权力结构所积累的弊端和隐患将逐渐显现,给网络安全带来威胁。美国作为网络空间的创造者、主要行为体以及主要受益者,有能力也有责任为建构网络空间安全状态提供支持,然而美国一味追求美国自身网络空间绝对安全、攫取网络空间利益、宣扬美国价值观,为网络空间安全的权力建构带来负面影响。美国应承担起与其能力相应的国际责任,努力增强网络空间互信、推动国际合作、共同治理、消除贫富差距、促进网络空间的繁荣与稳定。
[Abstract]:Xi pointed out that without network security, there would be no national security, and without information, there would be no modernization.With the development of science and technology, cyberspace is becoming more and more important in modern civilization.As a new artificial technology domain, cyberspace has both the technical support from the physical domain and the conceptual support from the cognitive domain in the process of its construction. Therefore, the cyberspace security should consider the physical and cognitive domains of cyberspace comprehensively.It can be divided into three meanings: basic security of network, orderly behavior of cyberspace and reasonable distribution of interests in cyberspace.In order to ensure cyberspace security, in addition to strengthening the physical security of cyberspace technically, it is also necessary to shape the power structure in favor of cyberspace security through the concept construction of cognitive domain.Reality constructivism recognizes the existence of the real world and emphasizes that the construction of social structure by ideas is naturally compatible with cyberspace.It is realistic and feasible to study the social structure of cyberspace from the perspective of realistic constructivism.Realistic constructivism provides four forms of power.However, under the condition of frequent connection in cyberspace, these four forms are too complicated and unfavorable to effectively grasp the power structure of cyberspace.With the help of Alexander Winter, one of the founders of constructivism, who divides the identification process into three levels: compulsion, self-interest and legitimacy, identity is recognized by cyberspace actors.The power in cyberspace can be divided into procedural power which influences the thinking mode of actors, structural power to threaten punishment and resource power to induce cooperation and profit.Although the distribution of the three kinds of power in the current cyberspace has basically guaranteed the stability of the cyberspace, it has not constructed a power structure that is conducive to the long-term development and security of the cyberspace.The disadvantages and hidden dangers accumulated by the current network power structure will gradually appear and threaten the network security.As the creator of cyberspace, the main actors and the main beneficiaries, the United States has the ability and responsibility to provide support for the construction of cyberspace security. However, the United States pursues the absolute security of its own cyberspace.Seizing the interests of cyberspace, propagating American values and bringing negative influence to the power construction of cyberspace security.The United States should shoulder the international responsibility corresponding to its capabilities, strive to strengthen mutual trust in cyberspace, promote international cooperation, jointly govern, eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor, and promote the prosperity and stability of cyberspace.
【学位授予单位】：国防科学技术大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630;TP393.08

【相似文献】