转型语境与人性话语:新时期初期的沈从文重评

发布时间：2018-01-02 03:08

本文关键词：转型语境与人性话语:新时期初期的沈从文重评　出处：《复旦学报(社会科学版)》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：文学重评作为20世纪八十年代重要的文学现象,是新时期文学确立合法性的重要途径,也是现代文学研究范式转换的必经之路,它和重写文学史思潮一起贯穿了1978~1989年的全部文学进程,成为各种文学力量和话语体系博弈、交锋的关节点。在这些复杂的重评现象中,沈从文的重评和复出都比较有代表性。在国家意识形态置换形成的转型语境中,新时期文学首先反思沈从文在以左翼文学为线索的现代文学史中的定位,继而启用新的标准来重新评价沈从文创作的意义;同时,世界范围的"沈从文热"也启发了国内学界对沈从文的关注,海外汉学界的研究成果为国内的沈从文重评提供了理论资源和书写借鉴;在具体重评中,研究者启用了"人性"作为核心概念,谨慎地推敲重评沈从文的成规和尺度,在对个人和文学史的双重观照中实现了沈从文文学形象的全新建构。
[Abstract]:As an important literary phenomenon in 1980s, literature re-evaluation is an important way to establish the legitimacy of literature in the new period, and is also the only way to change the paradigm of modern literature research. It, together with the trend of rewriting literary history, runs through all the literary processes from 1978 to 1989, and becomes the key point of the game between various literary forces and discourse systems. Shen Congwen's re-evaluation and comeback are more representative. In the transformation context of the replacement of national ideology, the literature of the new period first reflects on the positioning of Shen Congwen in the history of modern literature with the left wing literature as the clue. Then we use new standards to re-evaluate the significance of Shen Congwen's creation; At the same time, the worldwide "Shen Congwen fever" has also inspired the domestic academic circles to pay close attention to Shen Congwen, the overseas Sinology research result has provided the theory resources and the writing reference for the domestic Shen Congwen reappraisal; In the specific re-evaluation, the researcher used "human nature" as the core concept, carefully re-evaluated Shen Congwen's rules and standards. In the dual view of individual and literary history, Shen Congwen realized the new construction of literary image.
【作者单位】：烟台大学人文学院;
【基金】：山东省高校人文社会科学研究项目“现代化意识形态与新时期文学重评关系研究”(项目批准号:RW15J12)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.42
【正文快照】： 经典重评是20世纪八十年代重要的文学现象,与重写文学史思潮一同贯穿了八十年代的始终,成为特殊语境下的现代文学知识生产方式。在重评中,一直作为左翼文学对立面的自由主义文学,实现了艺术层面的合法化,成功酝酿了新的文学史范式。在这种文学史书写格局的变化中,很多作家在重

【相似文献】