翁心存《阅微草堂笔记》评点研究
本文关键词:翁心存《阅微草堂笔记》评点研究 出处:《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:《阅微草堂笔记》作为清代笔记小说的代表,在中国文言小说史上占有重要的地位。然而,《阅微草堂笔记》的评点研究长期以来没有得到充分的重视。本文选取《阅微草堂笔记》评点者中重要的一家——翁心存为研究对象,希望通过对翁心存评点的研究,对这部分内容有所补益。本文将分三个部分,对翁心存《阅微草堂笔记》评点进行尽可能全面的研究。第一章以现有的文献材料为依据,介绍翁心存其人的具体状况,并利用文献学知识,分析翁心存评点本的具体情况,包括翁评本的版本问题、评点时间的问题,从而对翁心存本人及其评点本有基础的认识与了解,也为下文的进一步研究打好基础。第二章从翁心存对《阅微草堂笔记》思想内容的评点入手,利用对比研究的方法,探讨翁心存与纪昀在鬼神观、社会问题、为人处世、道学、小说观等观念上的异同之处。整体而言,翁心存是服膺纪昀的思想观点的,在字里行间流露出对纪昀的赞赏,但是,在许多方面,翁心存又表现出明显的个人思想与风格,尤其是对道学的见解。这表明,翁心存是在思想契合的前提下服膺与赞赏纪昀的思想的,而非简单的跟从。第三章以评点风格、评点形式两个方面为重点,探讨翁心存评点的艺术特色。在评点风格方面,翁心存随处生发、悠然闲适,表现出了明显的个人化评点特色。在评点形式方面,翁心存采取了特殊的"用故事阐释故事"的评点方式,有别于传统的议论式评点,这些故事与原文或互相补充,或有所拓展,丰富了原文的内容。同时,通过叙事学的对比,可以发现二人叙事风格上的异同,而其相异之处则让同一个故事生发出了多样的阅读趣味。
[Abstract]:As the representative of the note-taking novels of the Qing Dynasty, it plays an important role in the history of classical Chinese novels. For a long time, not enough attention has been paid to the research on the evaluation of "reading notes of micro-Caotang". This paper selects Weng Xinchuan, one of the most important evaluators of "Reading the Notes of Micro-Caotang", as the object of study. Hope that through the study of Weng Xinju comments, this part of the content will be helpful. This paper will be divided into three parts. The first chapter is based on the existing literature materials to introduce Weng Xinju's specific situation and make use of the philological knowledge. This paper analyzes the specific situation of Weng XinCun's comments, including the issue of the version of Weng's comments and the question of the time of comment, so as to have a basic understanding and understanding of Weng Xinju himself and his comments. The second chapter starts with the comments of Weng Xin-Cun on the ideological content of "reading notes of micro-Caotang", and uses the method of comparative study to discuss the social problems between Weng Xin-Cun and Ji Yun in the view of ghosts and spirits. On the whole, Weng XinCun is convinced of Ying Ji Yun's ideas, showing appreciation for Ji Yun in the lines, but in many ways. Weng Xin-Cun also showed obvious personal thoughts and styles, especially his views on Taoism, which showed that Weng Xin-Cun was accepting and appreciating Ji Yun's thought under the premise of consonance with his thoughts. The third chapter focuses on two aspects: comment style, comment form, discuss the artistic characteristics of Weng Xin Cun comment. In the comment style aspect, Weng Xin Cun grows everywhere, leisurely and leisurely. In the aspect of comment form, Weng Xincun adopts a special way of "explaining stories with stories", which is different from the traditional argumentative comments. These stories complement each other or expand to enrich the content of the original text. At the same time, through the comparison of narratology, we can find the similarities and differences in the narrative style of the two people. The difference between the same story gave birth to a variety of reading fun.
【学位授予单位】:北京外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴波;;《阅微草堂笔记》序跋辑考及其文献价值[J];武汉大学学报(人文科学版);2015年03期
2 李正学;;论古代小说批评的形态[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2013年06期
3 吴波;;《阅微草堂笔记》“四大家”评点论略[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
4 刘勇强;;“言”、“曰”之间:《阅微草堂笔记》的叙事策略[J];明清小说研究;2013年01期
5 吴波;;徐时栋评点《阅微草堂笔记》探析[J];中国文学研究(辑刊);2012年02期
6 陈中伟;;《阅微草堂笔记》的叙事视角[J];名作欣赏;2008年08期
7 陈文新;;《阅微草堂笔记》与中国叙事传统[J];南京师范大学文学院学报;2006年02期
8 韩希明;;试论《阅微草堂笔记》的伦理判断[J];兰州大学学报;2006年01期
9 蒋小平;雍容·有益人心·儒道佛整合——《阅微草堂笔记》之三层解读[J];中国文学研究;2005年01期
10 谭帆;中国古代小说评点形态论[J];文艺理论研究;1998年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 魏晓虹;《阅微草堂笔记》研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
2 陈心浩;明清小说评点范畴研究[D];河北大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 胡光明;《阅微草堂笔记》版本与评点研究[D];北京大学;2011年
2 张舒宁;中国小说评点形式的现代性思考[D];清华大学;2009年
,本文编号:1435593
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1435593.html