独立性与依附性:从性格差异看鲁迅与周作人不同的人生选择

发布时间：2018-03-03 14:42

本文选题：鲁迅　切入点：周作人　出处：《中国现代文学研究丛刊》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：周氏"兄弟失和"及对不同人生道路的选择,不是政治、经济或个人"私德"的原因,而是由周作人的依附性与鲁迅的独立性导致的。周作人内在的"书癖"个性和外在的时时有人庇护和照顾的成长环境,养成了他性格上的依附性。童幼年时期依附父母,青少年时期依附长兄,结婚以后依附夫人羽太信子;政治上,前期依附于五四新文化团体,后期则依附于日本侵略势力。"兄弟失和"是他改变了依附对象后的一种必然的选择。之后的附逆,也是为在侵略者的刺刀下谋求一张安静的书桌而不顾民族大义,在政治上改变了他的依附对象。而鲁迅却自始至终具有独立性,这种性格的独立性使鲁迅不依附于任何政治权利、经济权利和文化权利,保持了自己的独立的意志和人格,能够超越一切政治派别、传统藩篱和世俗伦理,始终以一个真正知识分子的强烈的社会责任感和承担意识对传统文化和现存体制保持批判和不妥协的态度。
[Abstract]:Chou's "brother discord" and his choice of different life paths are not the cause of political, economic or personal "private morality". Rather, it is the dependence of Zhou Zuoren and the independence of Lu Xun. Zhou Zuoren's inherent "book-fetish" personality and the external environment of growing up under the constant patronage and care of others have nurtured his dependence on character. When he was a child, he attached to his parents. He was attached to his eldest brother as a teenager, and to his wife, Prince Hsin-hyacinth, after marriage; politically, he was attached to the May 4th New Culture Group. Later he was attached to the Japanese forces of aggression. "Brotherly discord" was a necessary choice after he changed his attachment. The subsequent reversion was also for the purpose of seeking a quiet desk under the bayonet of the invaders, regardless of the national righteousness. On the other hand, Lu Xun had his independence from beginning to end, which made him independent from any political rights, economic rights and cultural rights, and maintained his own independent will and personality. Able to transcend all political factions, traditional barriers and secular ethics, always with a true intellectual's strong sense of social responsibility and commitment to the traditional culture and the existing system to maintain a critical and uncompromising attitude.
【作者单位】：河北大学文学院;
【分类号】：I206.6

【参考文献】