去魅:文化记忆幻象中的顾城与海子

发布时间：2018-03-26 11:23

本文选题：文化记忆　切入点：共同点　出处：《文艺理论研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：在中国新诗百年历程中,顾城与海子已经演变为当代记忆文化中不可或缺的文化符号,两者都具有一些记忆的共同点,持续地影响着后来读者的阅读兴趣,因此没有在碎片化的信息时代中被遗忘。然而他们身处文化记忆幻象中,并逐步成为新诗消费化、娱乐化的表征。同时,由于这种被杨·阿斯曼称之为"凝聚性结构"的象征体系的形成,使得两者诗文本与文本之外的因素混杂在一起,从而难以分辨,影响了大众的判断和接受。假象的被接受不等同于深层认同。顾城与海子所形成的"凝聚性结构"亟需被整理并突破,从而赢得一种精确的阐释。从诗歌文本的有意抬高到日常生活的神化,文学与日常生活经验互相渗透,诗人形象被不断演绎。以文化记忆为视角切入两人文化记忆共同点的内部从而"去魅",有利于读者对于两人的认识回归到诗歌本体层面,从而真正让海子和顾城回归到地平线。
[Abstract]:In the century-long history of Chinese new poetry, Gu Cheng and Haizi have evolved into indispensable cultural symbols in contemporary memory culture. Both have some common memory in common, which continuously affects the readers' reading interest. So they are not forgotten in the fragmented information age. However, they are in the illusion of cultural memory, and gradually become the symbol of consumption and entertainment of new poetry. At the same time, As a result of the formation of this symbolic system, which Yang Asman calls "condensed structure", the two texts are mixed with factors beyond the text, which makes it difficult to distinguish between them. The acceptance of false images is not equal to deep identification. The "condensed structure" formed by Gu Cheng and Haizi needs to be sorted out and broken through. Thus winning a precise interpretation. From the deliberate elevation of the text of poetry to the divinity of daily life, literature and daily life experience permeate each other, From the perspective of cultural memory, the poet is cut into the common ground of their cultural memory, thus "disenchantment", which is conducive to the readers' understanding of the two people returning to the level of poetry ontology, so that Haizi and Gu Cheng can truly return to the horizon.
【作者单位】：内蒙古大学文学与新闻传播学院;
【分类号】：I207.25

【相似文献】