清代骈文对辞赋的扩容

发布时间：2018-04-02 17:08

  本文选题：骈文　切入点：四六　出处：《中国文学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：骈文以句式对偶为主要特征,辞赋则讲究押韵、排偶等,两者不是同一层次的文体概念,具有层级性特征。唐宋元明的骈偶之文名为"四六",与辞赋平行发展,并行不悖。清代的骈偶之文演进为"俪体""骈体""骈文"等,多包括讲究排偶的辞赋,实现了对辞赋的扩容。清人既用"骈体""骈文"超越唐宋元明"四六"概念,将诗词曲之外的各类骈偶文章,包括辞赋纳入其中;又拓展原有"四六"内涵,多用之代指"骈体""骈文",辞赋也可纳入"四六"文集。但因为辞赋不追求四六隔对,明以前"四六"文集不收辞赋,因此清代也有《国朝骈体正宗》等少数选本延续此意。今天,我们笼统地说两者是交叉或平行,都不符合文学史的事实。对它们的关系梳理,不能抛开"四六"演进与骈文历史,不能脱离具体的语境与时代。
[Abstract]:Parallel prose is characterized by the duality of sentence pattern, while the Fu emphasizes rhyme, arrangement, etc. They are not the same level of stylistic concepts, but have hierarchical characteristics.Tang, Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties, named "four six", parallel to the development of Fu, parallel to each other.In the Qing Dynasty, the parallel prose evolved into "Li body", "parallel style", "parallel prose" and so on.The Qing Dynasty not only used "parallel style" and "parallel prose" to surpass the concept of "four six" in Tang, Yuan and Ming dynasties, but also extended the original connotation of "four or six".Multi-use refers to "parallel style" and "parallel prose", and ci Fu can also be included in the collection of "four or six" texts.But because ci Fu does not pursue four or six separate pairs, before Ming Dynasty, the collection of "four or six" texts did not accept ci Fu, so there were a few selected works such as "the State Dynasty parallel style authentic sect" in the Qing Dynasty to continue this meaning.Today, we generally say that the two are intersecting or parallel, which does not accord with the fact of literary history.To sort out their relations, we can not put aside the evolution of "four six" and the history of parallel prose, can not separate from the specific context and times.
【作者单位】： 湖南师范大学中国辞赋研究中心;
【基金】：湖南省教育厅重点项目“清代骈文视域中的桐城派”(17A135)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.22
，

本文编号：1701312