辩证的进化:后五四时代关于世界文化的辩论——侧重梁漱溟与胡适

发布时间：2018-04-14 22:37

本文选题：进化论 + 东西文化　；参考：《天津社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：在后五四时代,牵涉到进化差异的东西文化问题引发了争论。梁漱溟和胡适都具有全球眼光,也各有其民族论述的底线。梁漱溟借鉴了孔德的社会发展三段论,但加上了空间的划分,让时序空间化,挑战了风行的进化论。不过,看似多元的文化轮转,但每段仍仅单一文化,实即以线性的一元来涵容多元。同样侧重空间视角,梁漱溟又认为中西文化的差异是性质不同,而不是程度不及,故中国的发展是停滞而非落后。而胡适则本"适者生存"的进化论,在长期的历史中找到了中国文化存在的基础,也看到了复兴的希望,从历史向度确立了文化的主体性。
[Abstract]:In the post- May 4 th era, the issue of eastern and western cultures, which involved evolutionary differences, caused controversy.Liang Shuming and Hu Shi have a global vision, but also have their national discussion of the bottom line.Liang Shuming drew lessons from Kong de's syllogism of social development, but added the division of space to make time series space and challenge the popular theory of evolution.However, the seemingly pluralistic cultural rotation, but each section is still only a single culture, that is to say, a linear one to accommodate diversity.Also focusing on the spatial perspective, Liang Shuming believes that the differences between Chinese and Western cultures are different in nature, not in degree, so China's development is stagnant rather than backward.Hu Shi, on the other hand, has found the foundation of the existence of Chinese culture in the long history, has also seen the hope of rejuvenation, and established the subjectivity of culture from the historical aspect.
【作者单位】：四川大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：I206.6

【相似文献】