唐宋陈子昂诗歌论案研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 05:08

本文选题：陈子昂诗歌 + 复变　；参考：《江苏师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：陈子昂作为振兴唐诗的第一人,对后代影响深远。历代论者对其多有注目,并因此产生了大量的诗歌批评材料。本文截取唐宋这一时间段,搜集整理该时间段内陈子昂诗歌批评材料,旨在以该材料为研究对象,回到批评话语所发生的个人及社会文化环境中去,提炼出对陈子昂诗歌批评的焦点问题,深入探究不同批评观点产生的现实缘由,挖掘其背后所蕴含的文化内涵,进而厘清陈诗在整个唐宋文学史上的发展演进过程。整理研究发现,批评争议主要存在三个方面。一是关于陈子昂诗歌的复古、革新问题。唐宋时人多认为陈子昂革新一代颓风,在复古的同时有着“始变雅正”的重要贡献。而皎然则认为陈子昂“复多而变少”。本文将针对这一争议,具体整理归纳争议双方的不同观点,并对其背后缘由展开分析研究;二是关于陈子昂诗歌的音节、声律问题。前有孟启认为陈子昂“律诗殊少”,后有刘辰翁认为陈诗“音节犹不甚近”。但惠洪、朱熹等人则认为陈子昂在音节、声律方面有着一些值得肯定的地方。宋末方回更直言陈子昂“精于律诗”,甚至将其推到了“律诗之祖”的崇高地位。这一分歧构成了本文的第二部分,本文将对其背后缘由进行探究;三是关于陈子昂诗歌在历史上总体性评价的问题。自卢藏用的“道丧五百岁而得陈君”一说之后,有异议者唯颜真卿、皎然二人。本文将侧重对这三人观点进行分析,并对其他论者不同观点所折射的社会文化内涵进行探究。
[Abstract]:As the first person to revitalize Tang poetry, Chen Ziang has a profound influence on future generations. The scholars of all dynasties paid much attention to it and therefore produced a lot of poetic criticism materials. This paper intercepts the time period of Tang and Song dynasties, collects and arranges the material of Chen Ziang's poetry criticism in this time period, aiming at taking this material as the research object and returning to the personal and social cultural environment in which the critical discourse occurs. Abstract the focus of Chen Ziang's poetry criticism, deeply explore the realistic reason of different critical views, dig out the cultural connotation behind it, and then clarify the evolution process of Chen's poetry in the whole history of Tang and Song Dynasty literature. According to the research, there are three main aspects of criticism controversy. One is about Chen Ziang's poetry retro, innovates the question. In Tang and Song dynasties, many people thought that Chen Zi-ang 's innovation generation had the important contribution of "beginning to change elegance" while restoring the ancient times. And Jiao ran believes that Chen Ziang "more and less." In view of this dispute, this paper will concretely summarize the different viewpoints of both sides of the dispute, and analyze the reasons behind it. The second is about the syllable and the rhythm of Chen Ziang's poetry. Former Mengqi thought that Chen Ziang's "the law poem is unusual", later Liu Chenweng thought Chen's poem "the syllable is not very close". However, Huihong, Zhu Xi and others think that Chen Ziang has some positive aspects in syllables and rhythms. At the end of Song Dynasty, Fanghui said more bluntly that Chen Ziang was good at legal poetry, and even pushed it to the lofty status of "the ancestor of legal poetry". This difference constitutes the second part of this paper, this paper will explore the reasons behind it; third, on the overall evaluation of Chen Ziang's poetry in history. Since Lu Zang's "Tao mourning 500 years old and got Chen Jun" said, there are dissidents only Yan Zhenqing, Jiao ran two people. This paper will focus on the analysis of the three views and explore the social and cultural connotations reflected by the different views of other commentators.
【学位授予单位】：江苏师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22

【相似文献】