“五四”叙事的又一种形态——再从文学史书写谈起

发布时间：2018-05-15 08:29

本文选题：年代台湾 + “五四”叙事　；参考：《文学评论》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文以20世纪70年代台湾官方文学论述中的"五四"叙事为中心议题,讨论三部文学史文本(《现代中国文学史话》《中华民国文艺史》和《中国新文学史》)对"五四"新文化运动和文学革命的描述、理解和评价,分析作者的写作立场和叙事形成的若干因素。文章描述了三部文学史对新文化运动和文学革命的进步意义的肯定;概括了它们的一些共同趋向,即将"五四"运动的形成直接与中华民国的建立相联系,文学史观的基本模式是对"五四"的肯定与对随后新文学潮流的贬抑;讨论了这些"五四"叙事形成的因素,认为其中既包括对新文学主张的赞同,又存在与共产党争夺话语权的动机。文章同时期待以"五四"作为两岸中国人共同的精神资源的客观事实,来说明台湾"去中国化"论述的荒谬性质。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the "May 4th" narration in the official literary discourse of Taiwan in the 1970s. This paper discusses the description, understanding and evaluation of the May 4th New Cultural Movement and the Literary Revolution in the three texts of the History of Modern Chinese Literature (the History of Modern Chinese Literature) and the History of the Republic of China's Literature and Art and the History of New Chinese Literature. This paper analyzes the author's writing position and some factors in the formation of narration. The article describes the affirmation of the progressive significance of the three literary histories to the New Cultural Movement and the Literary Revolution, and summarizes their common trends, that is, the formation of the May 4th Movement is directly related to the establishment of the Republic of China. The basic mode of the view of literary history is the affirmation of the May 4th Movement and the belittling of the subsequent trend of new literature, and discusses the factors of the formation of the narrative of the May fourth Movement, which includes the approval of the new literature. There is also a motive for competing with the Communist Party for the right to speak. At the same time, the article looks forward to the objective fact that the May 4th Movement is the common spiritual resource of the Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to explain the absurd nature of Taiwan's argument of "deChina-ization".
【作者单位】：北京大学中文系;
【分类号】：I206.6

【相似文献】