当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 古代文学论文 >

林语堂与白话文的欧化

发布时间:2018-05-27 15:45

  本文选题:林语堂 + 欧化白话文 ; 参考:《西南大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:提到白话文运动,我们自然而然地会想到胡适、鲁迅,而事实上林语堂在白话文运动的初期也是得力战将之一,但在文学史上他却饱受争议,原因之一是其白话文及文章观念在1930年代的重大转变。本文主要围绕这一重大转变进行讨论,分析其转变之原因,以及转变之后的理论和实践的矛盾,文章主要分为林语堂与白话文运动、林语堂与欧化白话文、林语堂对白话文的实践三个部分,来分析林语堂对白话文的态度以及他在白话文运动中的位子,探讨林语堂对欧化白话进行反思、由积极推进白话文运动转而提倡“语录体”的原因,通过对其创作及翻译实践的分析,论述其“语录体”主张的不可操作性以及理论主张与创作实践的不一致性。本文将采用文本细读、材料分析、史料搜集、归纳总结等研究方法,并结合历史学、语言学知识对林语堂的创作和翻译实践进行细致的分析。文章分为三部分:第一部分,主要对白话、白话文、欧化白话文的概念进行界定,同时分析白话与白话文,欧化与白话文的关系;对林语堂在新文化运动前后的言论和实践的梳理,厘清林语堂在白话文运动中的位子及态度。第二部分,梳理林语堂在新文化运动前期对欧化白话文的创作实践,主要从主语增加、句子延长等五个部分来分析林语堂早期(1933年以前)创作中明显的欧化倾向;分析林语堂由积极推进白话文运动到反思欧化白话文进而转向提倡“语录体”的原因。第三部分,通过对其1933年后创作及翻译作品的分析,发现其翻译以及语录体的创作实践依然有明显的欧化特征;他所提倡的语录体只不过是有古意的欧化白话,他倡导的语录体并非真正幽默、性灵,只有闲适,从而论述其“语录体”主张在三十年代只是“搅局而已”。
[Abstract]:When it comes to the vernacular movement, it's natural to think of Hu Shi Lu Xun, and in fact Lin Yutang was one of the most successful men in the early days of the vernacular movement, but he was controversial in the history of literature. One reason is that its vernacular and literary ideas changed significantly in the 1930 s. This paper mainly discusses this important change, analyzes the reason of the change, and the contradiction between theory and practice after the transformation. The article is divided into Lin Yutang and vernacular movement, Lin Yutang and Europeanization vernacular writing. Three parts of Lin Yutang's practice of vernacular Chinese, to analyze Lin Yutang's attitude to vernacular and his position in vernacular movement, and to discuss Lin Yutang's reflection on Europeanized vernacular. From actively promoting the vernacular language movement to advocating the "quotation style", through the analysis of its creation and translation practice, this paper discusses the inoperability of its "quotation style" and the inconsistency between the theoretical proposition and the creative practice. In this paper, we will adopt the methods of text reading, material analysis, historical data collection, summary and so on, and make a detailed analysis of Lin Yutang's creation and translation practice with the knowledge of history and linguistics. The article is divided into three parts: the first part, mainly defines the concepts of vernacular, Europeanization vernacular, at the same time analyzes the relationship between vernacular and vernacular, Europeanization and vernacular; Combing the speech and practice of Lin Yutang before and after the New Culture Movement, the author clarifies the position and attitude of Lin Yutang in the vernacular language Movement. The second part, combing Lin Yutang's writing practice of Europeanized vernacular writing in the early stage of the New Cultural Movement, mainly analyzes the obvious Europeanization tendency in Lin Yutang's early (before 1933) creation from five parts: the increase of subject and the extension of sentence. This paper analyzes the reasons why Lin Yutang changed from actively promoting the vernacular movement to introspecting the Europeanized vernacular and then to advocating the "quotation style". In the third part, through the analysis of his creation and translation after 1933, it is found that his translation and the writing practice of the quotations still have obvious characteristics of Europeanization, and the quotations he advocates are only Europeanized vernacular with ancient meanings. The quotations he advocated were not really humorous, spiritual, but casual, so he argued that his quotation was only "stirring up the situation" in the 1930s.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I206.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冯智强;;林语堂“另一捆矛盾”的多维解读——从支持“白话文”到反对“欧化文”[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2014年06期

2 王本朝;;欧化白话文:在质疑与试验中成长[J];文学评论;2014年06期

3 王本朝;;白话文的说理优势:以朱自清的论说文体为中心[J];广东社会科学;2014年06期

4 王本朝;;白话文运动中的文章观念[J];中国社会科学;2013年07期

5 彭春凌;;林语堂与现代中国的语文运动[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2013年02期

6 余娜;;论林语堂早期语言学研究与新文化运动[J];南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期

7 陈欣欣;;论林语堂的白话文语言观与文学观[J];中国现代文学研究丛刊;2012年05期

8 胡全章;;清末白话文运动之理论建树[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2011年05期

9 赵炎秋;;近现代文白之争及其反思[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2011年05期

10 丁晓原;;“五四白话”与现代散文文体建构[J];文艺理论研究;2011年03期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 刘茉琳;论晚清至“五四”的白话文运作[D];暨南大学;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 陈思思;林语堂与1930年代小品文[D];华东师范大学;2014年

2 李s,

本文编号:1942770


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1942770.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8140a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com