《中国现代文学三十年》版本流变考

发布时间：2018-06-07 13:00

本文选题：中国现代文学三十年 + 版本流变　；参考：《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：20世纪80年代的“重写文学史”的提出引发了热烈的关注与讨论,1985年黄子平、陈平原、钱理群等提出关于“20世纪中国文学”的基本设想,强调整体意识,在时间上打通近代、现代和当代的界限,在内容上打通“文学理论、文学史、文学批评”的割裂。1987年陈思和出版了《中国新文学整体观》,同年上海文艺出版社出版了由钱理群、吴福辉、温儒敏和王超冰撰写的《中国现代文学三十年》一书。作为“文革”后中国现代文学史编写过程中具有转型意义的代表作和80年代中国现代文学史编撰的反思期中出现的一部引入了“现代性”的文学史撰写观念的书,《中国现代文学三十年》问世后成为众多高校的现代文学史教材。该书1987年出版以后又在1991年和1996年进行了封面的修改,在1998年进行了内容的补正和较大幅度的修订,同时由于王超冰没有参与修订,1998年的版本中作者写了钱理群、温儒敏和吴福辉三人,由北京大学出版社出版了《中国现代文学三十年》(修订本)。2005年该书被列为“九五”教育部重点教材,2011年被列为“十一五”国家级规划教材。2016年《中国现代文学三十年》(修订本)又进行了较多修改,在保留原有体例框架上吸收了学界的新成果以及作者的研究心得。该书从初版至今已经近三十年,经过五十多次印刷,在高校的使用覆盖率和学界引用率在文学史类的书籍中属于较高水平,关于版本的差异以及修改所体现出的对作家和作品的不同处理以及对他们的评价的变化对于研究80年代至今文学史写作者有一定意义。本文通过对比1987版、1998版和2016版《中国现代文学三十年》的具体内容、遣词造句、目录编排等各方面的变化,以变化较大的相关章节为顺序进行论述,联系到这些作家和作品从80年代至今的接受史情况,最后对发生这些变化的原因从文学标准、文学史观、研究心态和教育体制的演变四个方面总结归纳原因,并对现当代文学中版本研究的现状进行了介绍。
[Abstract]:The proposal of "rewriting the History of Literature" in the 1980s aroused heated attention and discussion. In 1985, Huang Ziping, Chen Plain, Qian Liqun and others put forward the basic idea of "Chinese Literature in the 20th Century", emphasizing the consciousness of the whole, and clearing up the modern times in time. The dividing line between modern and contemporary is the division of literary theory, literary history and literary criticism. In 1987, Chen Sihe published the whole View of Chinese New Literature, and in the same year Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House published Qian Liqun and Wu Fuhui. Three decades of Modern Chinese Literature by Wen Jumin and Wang Chaobing. As a representative work of transition in the process of writing the history of modern Chinese literature after the Cultural Revolution and a book in the introspection period of the compilation of the history of modern Chinese literature in the 1980s, the concept of "modernity" was introduced into the writing of literary history. Thirty years of Chinese Modern Literature became the teaching material of modern literature history in many colleges and universities. After the publication of the book in 1987, the cover of the book was revised in 1991 and 1996, and the contents were corrected and revised by a large margin in 1998. At the same time, because Wang Chaobing was not involved in the revision, the author wrote Qian Liqun in the 1998 edition. The three men, Wen Jumin and Wu Fuhui, Thirty years of Modern Chinese Literature (revised edition) was published by Peking University Press. In 2005, the book was listed as the key textbook of the Ministry of Education in the Ninth Five-Year Plan, and in 2011 it was listed as the "11th Five-Year Plan" national planning textbook. In 2016, the book was listed as the third edition of Chinese Modern Literature. Ten years > (revised) has been further revised, In the framework of retaining the original style, the author absorbs the new academic achievements and the author's research experience. It has been nearly 30 years since the first edition of the book. After more than 50 times of printing, the use coverage rate and academic citation rate in colleges and universities are at a high level in books of literary history. The difference of edition and the different treatment and evaluation of writers and works embodied in the revision are of certain significance to the study of writers of literary history from 1980s to present. In this paper, by comparing the specific contents, the choice of words and sentences, the cataloguing and so on in the 1987 edition and 2016 edition of "30 years of Modern Chinese Literature", this paper discusses the related chapters with great changes in order. In connection with the reception history of these writers and works from the 1980s to the present, the reasons for these changes are summarized from four aspects: the literary standards, the view of literary history, the research mentality and the evolution of the educational system. This paper also introduces the current situation of the study of edition in modern and contemporary literature.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.6

【参考文献】