中国叙事传统中的“互见法”研究
发布时间：2019-03-04 13:43
【摘要】：《史记》中运用互见法叙事十分广泛,形式多样,标记明显,广为后人传颂,深刻影响了后世的史学和文学创作。本文以互见法为研究对象,从《史记》中的互见法入手,对叙事传统进行推源溯流的研究,以期对中国古代的叙事传统进行梳理。文章共分为三个部分。第一部分集中梳理《史记》之前运用互见法叙事的经验,从四个角度分析《史记》互见法对前代叙事经验的继承,这是中国叙事传统的源头。一是《周易》“原始察终”及互卦的思维方式;二是《庄子》反复互见论说的篇章安排;三是《左传》《国语》《战国策》等隐性互见的先声;四是《吕氏春秋》“解在乎”的互见形式。这些前代著作从叙事的思维方式、叙事的具体篇章安排、用隐性互见法叙事和显性的互见法标记叙事这四个方面给司马迁以不少启发。在继承前代叙事经验的基础上,司马迁加以创造,使之适合历史叙事。第二部分主要分析《史记》中的互见法,并对其进行反思。第一节从狭义广义和隐性显性这两个角度对互见法进行界定,明确了互见法的定义;第二节对典型的隐性互见法进行了细致的分析,分为一篇之内互见和不同篇章之间互见这两种类型,一篇之内互见又分为传赞正反结合和论赞补传记之阙两种类型,而不同篇章之间互见又按照两处叙述内容的多少而分为有无互见、详略互见和并存互见三种;在细致分类的基础上,第三节从史学、文学和校勘考据这三个角度论述了运用互见法叙事的具体功用;经过对《史记》中用互见法叙事的详细分析,第四节从体例不够严密和互见提示用语随意这两个角度对互见法进行了反思。第三部分从两个方面探讨《史记》互见法的后世影响。第一节探讨对史学著作的影响,分为五体互见和篇章之间互见两种,而篇章之间的互见又可分为显性互见和隐性互见两种;第二节探讨互见法叙事对文学作品的影响,这一节将从结构体例,人物塑造和叙事技巧这三个方面来论述。总之,本文通过对《史记》文本中互见法叙事的研究,对此推源溯流,希望对中国的叙事传统作出一个较为清晰的梳理,为建构中国叙事传统作一点尝试。
[Abstract]:In the Records of History, the narrative method of mutual view is very extensive, diverse in form, marked obviously, and widely praised by posterity, which deeply affects the historiography and literary creation of later generations. This paper takes the method of mutual sight as the research object, starts with the method of mutual sight in the Records of History, and studies the origin of the narrative tradition in order to sort out the narrative tradition of ancient China. The article is divided into three parts. The first part focuses on the narrative experience of using the method of mutual view before Historical Records, and analyzes the inheritance of the narrative experience of the previous generation from four angles. This is the source of the Chinese narrative tradition. The first is the way of thinking of "primitive observation and final observation" and the way of thinking about each other, the second is the text arrangement of Zhuangzi's repeated views on each other, the third is the foresight of hidden mutual views, such as Zuo Zhuan (Zuo Zhuan), Zhan Guozhi (Zhan Guozhi), etc. The fourth is the form of mutual understanding of Lu's Spring and Autumn period. These works have enlightened Si Maqian from four aspects: the way of thinking of narration, the arrangement of specific chapters of narration, the narration of recessive mutual view and the marked narration of explicit mutual view. On the basis of inheriting the previous narrative experience, Si Maqian created it to suit the historical narrative. The second part mainly analyzes the method of mutual view in Records of History, and rethinks it. The first section defines the mutual view method from the narrow sense broad sense and the recessive dominance angle, and makes clear the definition of the mutual view law; The second section makes a detailed analysis of the typical implicit mutual view method, which is divided into two types, one is internal mutual sight and the other is between different chapters, the other is divided into two types: positive and negative combination of praise and negative, and on the que of praise and complement biographies. According to the number of the two narrative contents, the different chapters are divided into three types: mutual view or not, detailed mutual view and co-existence and mutual view; On the basis of detailed classification, the third section discusses the specific functions of narrative with the method of mutual view from the perspectives of historiography, literature and collation. Through a detailed analysis of the narrative with the method of mutual sight in the Records of History, the fourth section reflects on the method of mutual sight from two angles: the style is not tight enough and the language is random. The third part discusses the influence of mutual view from two aspects. The first section discusses the influence on historiography works, which can be divided into five types of mutual sight and one between chapters, and the other can be divided into two types: explicit mutual sight and recessive mutual sight. The second section discusses the influence of interviewing narration on literary works. This section will be discussed from three aspects: structural style, character shaping and narrative skills. In a word, through the study of the narrative of mutual sight in the text of Records of History, this paper goes back to the source and hopes to make a clear sorting out of the narrative tradition of China, and make some attempt to construct the narrative tradition of China.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.5
本文编号：2434313
[Abstract]:In the Records of History, the narrative method of mutual view is very extensive, diverse in form, marked obviously, and widely praised by posterity, which deeply affects the historiography and literary creation of later generations. This paper takes the method of mutual sight as the research object, starts with the method of mutual sight in the Records of History, and studies the origin of the narrative tradition in order to sort out the narrative tradition of ancient China. The article is divided into three parts. The first part focuses on the narrative experience of using the method of mutual view before Historical Records, and analyzes the inheritance of the narrative experience of the previous generation from four angles. This is the source of the Chinese narrative tradition. The first is the way of thinking of "primitive observation and final observation" and the way of thinking about each other, the second is the text arrangement of Zhuangzi's repeated views on each other, the third is the foresight of hidden mutual views, such as Zuo Zhuan (Zuo Zhuan), Zhan Guozhi (Zhan Guozhi), etc. The fourth is the form of mutual understanding of Lu's Spring and Autumn period. These works have enlightened Si Maqian from four aspects: the way of thinking of narration, the arrangement of specific chapters of narration, the narration of recessive mutual view and the marked narration of explicit mutual view. On the basis of inheriting the previous narrative experience, Si Maqian created it to suit the historical narrative. The second part mainly analyzes the method of mutual view in Records of History, and rethinks it. The first section defines the mutual view method from the narrow sense broad sense and the recessive dominance angle, and makes clear the definition of the mutual view law; The second section makes a detailed analysis of the typical implicit mutual view method, which is divided into two types, one is internal mutual sight and the other is between different chapters, the other is divided into two types: positive and negative combination of praise and negative, and on the que of praise and complement biographies. According to the number of the two narrative contents, the different chapters are divided into three types: mutual view or not, detailed mutual view and co-existence and mutual view; On the basis of detailed classification, the third section discusses the specific functions of narrative with the method of mutual view from the perspectives of historiography, literature and collation. Through a detailed analysis of the narrative with the method of mutual sight in the Records of History, the fourth section reflects on the method of mutual sight from two angles: the style is not tight enough and the language is random. The third part discusses the influence of mutual view from two aspects. The first section discusses the influence on historiography works, which can be divided into five types of mutual sight and one between chapters, and the other can be divided into two types: explicit mutual sight and recessive mutual sight. The second section discusses the influence of interviewing narration on literary works. This section will be discussed from three aspects: structural style, character shaping and narrative skills. In a word, through the study of the narrative of mutual sight in the text of Records of History, this paper goes back to the source and hopes to make a clear sorting out of the narrative tradition of China, and make some attempt to construct the narrative tradition of China.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈才训;;论宋懋澄的文化素养对其小说创作的影响[J];蒲松龄研究;2013年04期
2 鲍晨;;浅析《史记》和《红楼梦》创作上的共通性[J];安徽文学(下半月);2013年05期
3 李洲良;;史迁笔法:藏美刺于互见[J];文艺评论;2011年12期
4 苏安国;;《史记》记述前后差异考辨两则[J];中国典籍与文化;2011年04期
5 潘卫卫;;论《唐诗纪事》的体例[J];九江学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
6 李艳;;论《汉书》的显性互见法[J];济宁学院学报;2011年01期
7 吴紫英;;试论《世说新语》王戎形象及其写法[J];现代语文(文学研究版);2010年03期
8 尹福Oz;;《史记》与《儒林外史》:叙事模式的承传与重构[J];学理论;2009年22期
9 郭明友;;《史记》“互见法”再论[J];云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期
10 杨丁友;;《史记》“互见法”艺术论[J];河南社会科学;2008年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 刘松来;周兴泰;;《庄子》道论三题[A];江西省文艺学会2003年年会论文集[C];2003年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 王晓玲;清代《史记》文学阐释论稿[D];陕西师范大学;2012年
2 耿朝晖;释慧皎《高僧传》文学探析[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
3 葛鑫;《史记》对四大名著的叙事影响研究[D];中央民族大学;2010年
4 李秀华;《淮南子》许高二注研究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
5 钟书林;《后汉书》文学论稿[D];陕西师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王君梅;论《梁书》的文学价值[D];黑龙江大学;2014年
2 曹冰青;金兆燕及其戏曲研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年
3 王会丹;《唐才子传》编纂学研究[D];广州大学;2012年
4 刘小姣;《三国志》战争描写研究[D];西南大学;2012年
5 安敏;《史记》的叙事结构系统[D];华中师范大学;2002年
，本文编号：2434313
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2434313.html
