丧偶后不同阶段老年人健康状况及影响因素研究
本文关键词: 丧偶老年人 不同阶段 健康状况 影响因素 出处:《山东中医药大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目的:通过对丧偶后三年内不同阶段的老年人的健康状况进行调查,了解丧偶后不同阶段老年人的健康状况,分析丧偶后不同阶段老年人健康状况的影响因素,为今后有针对性开展丧偶后不同阶段老年人的健康干预提供参考依据。方法:采用方便抽样方法,运用一般资料问卷、SF-12生命质量量表、UCLA孤独量表、GDS老年人抑郁量表及SSRS社会支持量表对丧偶后不同阶段的老年人进行调查;全部数据采用Epidata软件进行双录入,使用SPSS 21.0统计软件包进行统计分析,计量资料采用均值、标准差表示,计数资料采用频数、构成比表示;计量资料采用t检验或方差分析等,计数资料采用卡方检验;多因素分析采用逐步多重线性回归、Logistic回归分析。检验水准以P05.0,表示差异存在统计学意义。结果1.基本情况:纳入调查的丧偶老年人共计314例,新近丧偶阶段(丧偶后第1~3个月)老年人71例(占22.6%),早期丧偶阶段(丧偶后第4~6个月)78例(占24.8%),中期丧偶阶段(丧偶后第7~12个月)80例(25.5%),晚期丧偶阶段(丧偶后第13~36个月)85例(27.1%);各丧偶阶段老年人人口学资料无统计学差异(P05.0)。2.SF-12量表评分情况:不同丧偶阶段老年人SF-12量表得分不同,新近丧偶组(42.43?14.17),早期丧偶组(46.26?16.24),中期丧偶组(52.11?7.34),晚期丧偶组(52.77?13.08),丧偶6个月内老年人生命质量最低。多重线性回归分析显示,影响丧偶6个月老年人生命质量的主要影响因素有慢性病、城乡差异、居住状态、配偶的丧亡方式。3.UCLA孤独量表评分情况:不同丧偶阶段老年人UCLA孤独量得分不同,新近丧偶组(40.72?6.47),早期丧偶组(38.74?4.59),中期丧偶组(37.86?3.16),晚期丧偶组(35.67?4.98),新近丧偶阶段老年人孤独感最高(P05.0)。在新近丧偶阶段,居住状态、配偶不同丧亡方式对老年人的孤独感差异存在统计学意义(P05.0)。4.GDS老年抑郁量表评分情况:丧偶三年内老年人抑郁症状的发生率为38.6%,其中轻度抑郁症状有25.2%,中重度抑郁症状的发生率为13.4%,无抑郁症状者占61.5%。在丧偶6个月内,不同居住状态、慢性病状态及年龄对丧偶老年人抑郁症状发生状况差异均具有统计学意义(P05.0)。5.SSRS社会支持量表评分情况:不同丧偶阶段老年人社会支持状况不同,新近丧偶组(32.30?4.88),早期丧偶组(32.41?5.50),中期丧偶组(34.88?4.61),晚期丧偶组(35.62?4.43),丧偶6个月内老年人的社会支持状况最低(P05.0)。丧偶6个月内,不同性别、不同文化程度、城乡差异、不同居住状态以及不同慢性病状态对丧偶老年人社会支持现状差异具有统计学意义(P05.0)。结论1.丧偶三年内老年人的生命质量整体较低,丧偶6个月老年人的生命质量最低。就丧偶6个月内老年人而言,患有慢性病、农村、独居、配偶不可预料性丧亡为影响丧偶6个月内老年人生命质量的危险因素。2.丧偶三年内老年人的心理健康状况堪忧,新近丧偶阶段老年人孤独感最高,丧偶6个月内老年人抑郁症状发生率最高。独居、配偶不可预料性丧亡为新近丧偶老年人孤独感的危险因素。丧偶后6个月内,高龄、患慢性病的独居老年人抑郁症状的发生率高。3.丧偶三年内老年人的社会支持系统需要加强,丧偶6个月老年人的社会支持最低,女性、低文化程度、农村、独居、患慢性病为丧偶6个月老年人社会支持状况的危险因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: through the investigation of different stages of three years after the widowed in the health status of the elderly, widowed after different stages of understanding the health status of the elderly, widowed after the analysis of the factors influencing the health status of the elderly in different stages, for the future to provide reference for the different stages of widowed elderly people to carry out health intervention. Methods: using convenience sampling method, using the general information questionnaire, SF-12 life quality scale, UCLA scale, GDS scale and SSRS depression in the elderly social support scale to investigate the different stages of the widowed elderly people; all the data were input by Epidata software, using SPSS 21 statistical software package for statistical analysis, the measurement data using mean, standard deviation, count data using frequency, proportion; measurement data using t test and variance analysis, count data using chi square test cases; Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, Logistic regression analysis. Standard test to P05.0, said there were statistically significant differences. Results of the 1. basic conditions: the investigation into the widowed elderly in 314 cases of newly widowed stage (widowed after 1~3 months) in 71 elderly patients (22.6%), early stage (after the widowed widowed the first 4~6 months) in 78 cases (24.8%), middle stage (7~12 after widowed widowed months) in 80 cases (25.5%), late stage (13~36 after widowed widowed months) in 85 cases (27.1%); the widowed elderly stage demographic data showed no statistically difference (P05.0).2.SF-12 scale the scores of different stages: widowed elderly SF-12 scores, newly widowed group (42.43? 14.17), early widowed group (46.26? 16.24), middle group widowed (52.11? 7.34), advanced group widowed (52.77? 13.08), quality of life or even 6 months old. Multiple linear minimum regression analysis showed that. The influencing factors mainly affect the quality of life of 6 months widowed elderly people with chronic diseases, the difference between urban and rural areas, living state, spouse bereavement.3.UCLA Loneliness Scale scores of different stages: widowed elderly UCLA loneliness scores, newly widowed group (40.72? 6.47), early widowed group (38.74? 4.59), interim the widowed group (37.86? 3.16), advanced group widowed (35.67? 4.98), newly widowed elderly loneliness highest stage (P05.0). Living in the newly widowed state stage, significant loneliness of the elderly of different spouse bereavement differences (P05.0).4.GDS Geriatric Depression Scale score: widowed three years old people the incidence of depressive symptoms was 38.6%, including mild depressive symptoms in 25.2%, severe depressive symptoms occurred in 13.4% of the depressive symptoms accounted for 61.5%. in the widowed 6 months, not living status, chronic disease status and age of death The depressive symptoms of elderly people even status differences were statistically significant (P05.0).5.SSRS social support scale: the different stages of the social support to the elderly in widowed, newly widowed group (32.30? 4.88), early widowed group (32.41? 5.50), middle group widowed (34.88? 4.61), widowed group (late 35.62? 4.43), or within 6 months of the elderly social support status of the lowest (P05.0). Different gender widowed within 6 months, the different cultural degree, the difference between urban and rural areas, different living conditions and different chronic diseases of the widowed elderly social support status. The difference was statistically significant (P05.0). Conclusion: 1. widowed quality three years of life of the elderly is low, widowed elderly 6 months. The lowest quality of life within 6 months of widowed elderly, suffering from chronic disease in rural areas, living alone, spouse can not expected of bereavement effect within 6 months of widowed elderly life .2. risk factors of quality of mental health status of widowed three years old people worrying, newly widowed elderly loneliness highest stage, widowed 6 months old. The highest incidence of depressive symptoms alone, spouse unpredictable bereavement risk factors for newly widowed elderly loneliness. 6 months after the widowed and the elderly, elderly people suffering from chronic diseases of the depressive symptoms of the high incidence of.3. within three years of widowed elderly social support system needs to be strengthened, the widowed elderly 6 months minimum social support, female, low education level, rural areas, living alone, suffering from chronic diseases for the elderly widowed 6 months of social support status the risk factors.
【学位授予单位】:山东中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R473.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何尔杨,黄有伟,李建平;福建林学院教职工健康状况分析[J];中国学校卫生;2001年05期
2 张一鸣;德清县教师健康状况的分析与对策[J];职业与健康;2002年02期
3 何远航;;泉州市高校教师健康状况和生活方式的调查研究[J];井冈山医专学报;2008年02期
4 刘腊梅;周兰姝;;老年人照顾者的健康状况及其影响因素的调查分析[J];中华护理杂志;2008年07期
5 许海霞;;特需体检病人健康状况调查及其对策[J];中外医疗;2008年24期
6 张永辉;王征兵;;我国农村居民自评健康状况的实证分析[J];中南财经政法大学学报;2009年05期
7 王运良;孙翔云;代强甫;刘海燕;;某市公务员健康状况和体育锻炼现状调查[J];现代预防医学;2011年04期
8 全英玲;杨丽黎;黄美丽;;富阳市农村中老年人生活行为习惯与健康状况调查分析[J];护理与康复;2011年09期
9 邵f^;张晓华;;南京市某社区老年人健康状况调查[J];中国误诊学杂志;2011年32期
10 陈思蕾;胡秀玮;;社区老年人健康状况调查[J];卫生职业教育;2012年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 文士博;;不良的健康状况:值得关注的几种特殊群体[A];中国心理卫生协会第四届学术大会论文汇编[C];2003年
2 刘雅;杨虹;;105例社区老年人营养咨询和健康状况调查分析[A];中国西部第六届营养与健康学术会议论文集[C];2011年
3 刘雅;尹素玲;;105例社区老年人营养咨询和健康状况调查分析[A];营养与老年代谢病——达能营养中心第十四届学术年会论文集[C];2011年
4 梁文珍;谭文娟;舒放;;癌症患者家属心理健康状况调查[A];玉溪市第四届精神科学术年会暨心身疾病综合治疗研讨会论文集[C];2010年
5 马立芳;许振慧;何霭娜;徐洁;周伟民;周建军;;上海市黄浦区家庭主妇健康状况及影响因素分析[A];膳食营养、身体活动与健康——达能营养中心第十一次学术年会会议论文集[C];2008年
6 陶明锐;兰天翔;;铁路企业女职工健康状况调查[A];2012年铁路卫生防疫学术年会论文集[C];2012年
7 赖建强;荫士安;;中国育龄妇女、孕妇和乳母的营养与健康状况[A];中国营养学会第十次全国营养学术会议暨第七届会员代表大会论文摘要汇编[C];2008年
8 高红兰;;糖尿病健康状况调查[A];中国营养学会公共营养分会第八次会议暨中国居民膳食营养状况、营养改善与膳食相关慢性病研讨会论文集[C];2008年
9 金培勇;王凯;吴耀亮;吴朝阳;何雯;范嘉琦;唐忆云;刘海艳;;照顾者教育对改善脑卒中患者和家庭照顾者健康状况的效果观察[A];中国康复医学会第七次全国老年医学与康复学术大会资料汇编[C];2012年
10 尹晓晨;荫士安;胡余明;;补充锌对育龄妇女营养与健康状况的影响[A];中国营养学会妇幼营养第七次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 余祖伟;教育水平和健康状况的关系[D];武汉大学;2010年
,本文编号:1526981
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/huliyixuelunwen/1526981.html