非高血压人群维生素D和甲状旁腺激素与血压的关系
本文选题:维生素D 切入点:甲状旁腺素 出处:《中国全科医学》2016年18期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:目的探讨非高血压人群维生素D和甲状旁腺激素与血压的关系。方法选择2011年3月—2012年8月宁波大学医学院附属医院体检中心参加健康体检的非高血压成年人271例为研究对象。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法测定血清25羟维生素D〔25(OH)D〕水平,电化学发光免疫测定(ECLIA)法测定血清全段甲状房腺激素(i PTH)水平。按照血清25(OH)D水平四分位数将受试者分为4组,即1~16μg/L组(65例)、17~25μg/L组(68例)、26~34μg/L组(66例)、35~65μg/L组(72例)。按照血清i PTH水平四分位数将受试者分为4组,即7.8~34.1 ng/L组(65例)、34.2~48.4 ng/L组(70例)、48.5~60.2 ng/L组(65例)、60.3~109.2 ng/L组(71例)。比较各组受试者年龄、性别、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、高血压前期患病率(pre HBP)、生化常规〔包含总胆红素(TBIL)、清蛋白(ALB)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γGT)、血尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)、血尿酸(BUA)、总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、空腹血糖(FPG)〕和25(OH)D或i PTH。结果不同25(OH)D水平组间年龄、SBP、DBP、pre HBP、ALB、ALT、Cr、TC、LDL-C、i PTH比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。不同i PTH水平组间年龄、DBP、ALB、25(OH)D比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。25(OH)D水平与年龄、SBP、DBP、pre HBP、γGT、BUA、TC、LDL-C、i PTH呈负相关(P0.05)。i PTH水平与年龄、DBP、pre HBP、TC呈正相关(P0.05)。简单线性回归分析结果显示,25(OH)D水平与SBP、DBP之间存在线性依存关系(P0.05);i PTH水平与DBP之间存在线性依存关系(P0.05)。多元线性回归分析结果显示,在逐渐调整并增加混杂因素后,25(OH)D与血压水平之间依存程度并无明显变化,随着25(OH)D水平的升高,SBP、DBP水平逐渐降低,并且这一趋势不受肝功能、肾功能、血脂、血糖、年龄及性别的影响(P0.05);在逐渐调整并增加混杂因素后,i PTH水平与DBP之间依存程度并无明显变化,随着i PTH水平的升高,DBP水平亦逐渐升高,并且这一趋势不受肝功能、肾功能、血脂、血糖、年龄及性别的影响(P0.05)。结论低25(OH)D水平和高i PTH水平可能是高血压的危险因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone and blood pressure in non-hypertensive population. Methods 271 healthy adults were selected from the physical examination center of affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Medical College from March 2011 to August 2012 to study the relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone and blood pressure. Elisa assay was used to determine the serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D ~ (25) OHH ~ (2 +) level. Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) was used to determine the whole thyroid atrial hormone (PTH). The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the quartile of serum 25 OHH D level. That is, 65 patients in 16 渭 g / L group were divided into 4 groups according to the quartile of serum I PTH level, 65 patients in 7.834.1 ng/L group (65 cases) and 70 cases in ng/L group (68.5g / 60.2 ng/L). There were 65 cases with 60.3109.2 ng/L and 71 cases in ng/L group. The age, sex, sex of the subjects were compared according to the quartile number of serum I / P / L group (7.834.1 渭 g / L), 65 patients were divided into four groups, namely, 7.834.1 ng/L group (n = 65) with a total of 68.5g / L / L group (n = 65) and 63.109.2 ng/L group (n = 71). The age, sex and sex of the subjects were compared with those of the control group (n = 65). SBP, DBP, pre HBP, biochemistry (including total bilirubin TBILN, Albumin, alanine aminotransferase, 纬 -glutamyltransferase (纬 -GTT), blood urea nitrogen bunn, creatinine Crn, blood uric acid BUAA, total cholesterol TCU, triacylglycerol, triacylglycerol). TGG, HDL-CU, LDL-Cn, FPGN) and 25 OHHHG or I PTHs. Results the results showed that the PTH was compared between the two groups with different levels of 25 OHHD, pre-HBPnb, ALTCL-Con, and FBG, and the results were as follows: (1) the results were as follows: (1) the results showed that there were no significant differences in PTH between the two groups with different levels of TGG, HDL-CU, LDL-Con, and the levels of 25 OHHN, or I PTHN. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was a negative correlation between the level of P0.05 PTH and the age of SBP0. 05 PTH, 纬 GTBUAT TCU LDL-Cni PTH and the level of P0. 05 PTH. There was a positive correlation between the level of P0. 05 and pre HBPTC. The results of simple linear regression analysis showed that there was a linear relationship between the level of OHH D and the level of DBP. There was a linear relationship between the level of PTH and the level of DBP, and there was a linear relationship between the level of PTH and the level of DBP in the two groups (P 0. 05) and the results of simple linear regression analysis showed that there was a linear relationship between the level of PTH and the level of DBP. The results of multivariate linear regression analysis showed that, After adjusting and increasing the confounding factors, there was no significant change in the degree of dependence between OHD and blood pressure level. With the increase of 25 OHH D level, the DBP level of SBP decreased gradually, and this trend was not affected by liver function, renal function, blood lipid, blood glucose. After adjusting and increasing the confounding factors, there was no significant change in the degree of dependence between I PTH level and DBP, and with the increase of I PTH level, the DBP level increased gradually, and this trend was not affected by liver function and renal function. The effects of blood lipid, blood glucose, age and sex on blood lipids (P 0.05). Conclusion the low level of 25 OHH D and the high level of I PTH may be the risk factors of hypertension.
【作者单位】: 宁波大学医学院附属医院心内科;
【分类号】:R446.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 夏征;胡亚卓;张红红;韩志涛;白洁;傅淑宏;邓新立;何耀;;维生素D受体基因FokⅠ及BsmⅠ多态性与老年男性2型糖尿病脂代谢异常的相关性[J];南方医科大学学报;2014年11期
2 胡文革;肖艳敏;;维生素D水平与高血压病的相关性探讨[J];中国医药指南;2014年24期
3 邬u&;聂磊;徐荣;雷梦觉;龚爱斌;涂燕平;王凌玲;;老年单纯收缩期高血压患者血清甲状旁腺激素水平及其与血压、大动脉僵硬度的相关性[J];中华高血压杂志;2014年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 蔡秋玲;;原发性高血压患者单纯收缩期高血压及单纯舒张期高血压血压负荷值相关性[J];河北医药;2016年21期
2 蔡蔚;沈小雅;朱宝平;潘石蕾;;汉族人群维生素D受体基因Fok Ⅰ多态性与特发性早产的相关性[J];南方医科大学学报;2016年09期
3 朱德才;马龙洲;麦一峰;;非高血压人群维生素D和甲状旁腺激素与血压的关系[J];中国全科医学;2016年18期
4 赵顺荣;李兴升;;机体衰老所致动脉硬化的研究进展[J];现代医药卫生;2016年11期
5 向茜;李万碧;张弦;刘华;王玉明;杨才;白云霞;郭燕;张永新;李勇军;;维生素D受体基因FokI位点单核苷酸多态性与糖尿病肾病的相关性[J];昆明医科大学学报;2016年04期
6 杨烨;肖珊;茅江峰;张园园;朱筠;;活性维生素D_3对糖尿病肾病大鼠维生素D受体及肾脏纤维化相关因子表达的影响[J];中华糖尿病杂志;2015年11期
7 曹勇;刘鑫;陈庄;赖小宇;左清娇;陈星如;邓宇;陈枫;;维生素D受体FokⅠ基因多态性与脂代谢紊乱的相关性[J];广东医学;2015年18期
8 李迪;黄晓波;张娜;刘剑雄;胡咏梅;刘雅;欧阳凌云;李秋;徐俊波;张廷杰;;成都地区中老年人群单纯收缩期高血压流行特点及其影响因素[J];中华高血压杂志;2015年02期
9 袁琳;;苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的疗效观察[J];世界临床医学;2015年01期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱学创;李利华;尹雪艳;;维生素D和高血压发病的研究进展[J];中国动脉硬化杂志;2010年12期
2 吉薇;蒋雄京;;维生素D状态与心血管危险[J];心血管病学进展;2010年03期
3 方向阳;吴金玲;牛红育;陆玫;刘淼冰;;老年高血压患者动脉僵硬度的影响因素[J];中华高血压杂志;2009年08期
4 韩昕;詹志伟;张红红;裴育;胡亚卓;王熙然;韩志涛;;北京部分汉族男性维生素D受体基因Fok Ⅰ多态性与骨密度的关系[J];中国组织工程研究与临床康复;2009年24期
5 刘承云;万晶晶;杨群芳;戚本玲;彭雯;陈学林;;华法林致大鼠血管中膜钙化与动脉收缩压升高的关系研究[J];中华老年心脑血管病杂志;2008年09期
6 吴雅利;雷梦觉;刘秋玲;涂燕平;龚爱斌;;单纯收缩期高血压病人年龄与血管内皮功能对大动脉僵硬度的影响[J];中华高血压杂志;2008年08期
7 朱光照;雷梦觉;;单纯收缩期高血压大动脉中层钙化形成机制[J];中华高血压杂志;2008年04期
8 万晶晶;刘承云;;动脉中层钙化与老年单纯收缩期高血压[J];中国老年学杂志;2008年05期
9 莫晓冬;赵慧萍;;慢性肾脏疾病血管钙化的病因及发病机制[J];广东医学;2007年10期
10 石艳军;沈轶;蔡立清;胡峰;杨艳燕;;维生素D受体基因多态性与糖尿病的相关性[J];中国糖尿病杂志;2007年04期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孔昭兰,董宣,田桂英;职业高血压人群的多维健康管理初探[J];工业卫生与职业病;1998年04期
2 吴培杰;高血压人群治疗观察[J];心肺血管病杂志;1998年02期
3 董淑丽,戴克俊,沈国英,刘海温;社区高血压人群系统管理三年效果分析[J];中国慢性病预防与控制;2000年03期
4 潘绮玲;188例高血压人群系统管理3年效果分析[J];浙江预防医学;2001年06期
5 刘敏,龚幼龙,胡兆铭,顾学琪,曹素华,詹绍康;高血压与非高血压人群相关知识和行为分析[J];中国公共卫生;2002年09期
6 尹萍,葛亚敏,王咏梅,陈美红;社区高血压人群健康教育需求调查与分析[J];社区医学杂志;2003年05期
7 李燕娜,侯武姿,武琳,杜雪平;社区高血压人群强化管理后依从性的改变[J];中华全科医师杂志;2003年01期
8 孙文娟,王雨,李鹏飞,彭颖,王永顺,徐守旗,富景辉;沈阳市高血压人群分布与危险因素分析[J];中国公共卫生;2004年06期
9 谷广泉,李月冰;社区高血压人群防治的误区分析[J];菏泽医学专科学校学报;2004年03期
10 张宏宇;高校高血压人群的健康教育[J];基层医学论坛;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 袭晓莹;胡美娟;董月华;李宏;;高血压与非高血压人群对高血压知识认知的比较分析(摘要)[A];全国铁路第五届疾病控制学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
2 郄大利;王彬,
本文编号:1615212
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/huliyixuelunwen/1615212.html