国内外危重症病人院内转运指南比较

发布时间：2018-04-20 20:31

本文选题：危重症病人 + 转运　；参考：《护理研究》2016年11期

【摘要】：[目的]比较国内外危重症病人院内转运指南,为危重症病人从急诊转运至其他科室提供借鉴和参考。[方法]使用PubMed、US National Guideline Clearinghouse等搜索引擎和万方医学数据库、中国知网(CNKI)学术期刊网络出版总库进行电子检索和人工检索,获取最新的危重症病人院内转运指南。检索截止时间为2015年4月1日。[结果]依据入选标准和排除标准获得4篇国内外报道的危重症病人院内转运指南或专家共识,并进行比较分析。[结论]4篇指南综合性都较强,可提供纲领性的指导方针,其中英国指南做了相关系统评价,循证依据较强,转运建议详细,操作流程和管理策略对实际应用指导意义较强。建议参考以上指南,结合自身特点,制定符合本院要求的急诊危重症病人院内转运管理规范。
[Abstract]:[objective] to compare the in-hospital transport guidelines of critically ill patients at home and abroad, and to provide reference for the transfer of critical patients from emergency to other departments. [methods] using the search engine of PubMedus National Guideline Clearinghouse and Wanfang Medical Database, CNKI academic journals were searched electronically and manually to obtain the latest in-hospital transportation guidelines for critically ill patients. The deadline for retrieval is April 1, 2015. [results] according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, four articles of in-hospital transport guidelines or expert consensus of critically ill patients were obtained and compared. [conclusion] the four guidelines are more comprehensive and can provide programmatic guidelines. The British guidelines have made systematic evaluation, with strong evidence-based basis, detailed transshipment recommendations, and strong operational process and management strategies for practical application. Referring to the above guidelines and combining with our own characteristics, we suggest to establish the in-hospital transportation management standard for emergency critical patients.
【作者单位】：山西医科大学;山西省人民医院;
【分类号】：R472.2

【相似文献】