科学传播的科学依据和历史依据——食用胎盘和注射羊胎素的个案研究

发布时间：2018-07-10 02:55

本文选题：食胎盘行为 + 羊胎素疗法　；参考：《科普研究》2016年05期

【摘要】：食用胎盘及羊胎素"活细胞疗法"的流行伴随着争议,支持方与反对方给出的依据主要涉及"科学"和"历史"两个方面。梳理目前的科学研究发现,食用胎盘的疗效与危害均无严格确凿的科学证据;羊胎素与"干细胞治疗"全无关联,羊胎素"活细胞疗法"也未得到监管机构认可。中国古代掩埋胎盘较食用胎盘的历史更为悠久,且胎盘入药自古便存在反对声音,因此历史悠久不能作为疗效证据。中国悠久的养生观念、养生产品的高需求和高利润,以及科学研究的缺失所留下的认知空间,导致此类产品在缺乏科学依据和历史依据的情况下仍然流行。
[Abstract]:The prevalence of "live cell therapy" in placenta and sheep foetus is controversial. The basis given by supporters and opponents mainly involves two aspects: "science" and "history". Combing the current scientific research, we found that there is no strict scientific evidence of the efficacy and harm of eating placenta, there is no relationship between sheep fetal hormone and stem cell therapy, and sheep fetal hormone living cell therapy has not been approved by the regulatory body. The placenta buried in ancient China has a longer history than the edible placenta, and the placenta medicine has been opposed since ancient times, so it can not be used as evidence of curative effect for a long time. China's long concept of health preservation, the high demand and high profit of health products, and the lack of scientific research leave the cognitive space for this kind of products, resulting in the lack of scientific basis and historical basis of this kind of products are still popular.
【作者单位】：中国科学院大学历史学系;
【分类号】：R45

【相似文献】