市场结构、产业关联与反倾销税率的确定

发布时间：2018-03-18 01:37

本文选题：反倾销税率　切入点：市场结构　出处：《中央财经大学学报》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：反倾销是我国产业保护的重要措施,如何确定符合公共利益原则、实现本国整体福利最大化的反倾销税率水平,是反倾销实践中一个亟待解决的重要问题。笔者以市场结构为切入点,考虑产业关联效应,构建动态博弈模型,运用逆向归纳法求解最优反倾销税率,并通过比较分析,重点考察市场结构对最优反倾销税率的影响。研究发现:(1)在不同的市场结构下,反倾销税总体现出负的贸易抑制效应和正的产业救济效应。与完全垄断的国内市场结构相比,在完全竞争的国内市场结构下,贸易抑制效应和产业救济效应均更为明显。(2)在不同的市场结构下,基于公共利益的政府总会选择征收适当的反倾销税。当市场容量充分大时,与完全垄断的国内市场结构相比,在完全竞争的国内市场结构下,最优反倾销税率较高。(3)在政府对各方利益平均赋权的前提下,最优税率与国内市场容量正相关,与国内厂商及其上游厂商的边际成本负相关,与国外厂商及其上游厂商的边际成本负相关。
[Abstract]:Anti-dumping is an important measure of industrial protection in China. How to determine the level of anti-dumping tax rate that conforms to the principle of public interest and maximizes the welfare of our country as a whole? It is an important problem to be solved urgently in the practice of antidumping. The author takes the market structure as the breakthrough point, considers the industrial connection effect, constructs the dynamic game model, uses the reverse induction method to solve the optimal anti-dumping tax rate, and through the comparative analysis, It is found that under different market structures, anti-dumping duties always reflect negative trade inhibition effect and positive industrial relief effect. Compared with the completely monopolized domestic market structure, In a fully competitive domestic market structure, the effects of trade inhibition and industrial relief are more pronounced. Under different market structures, governments based on the public interest always choose to impose appropriate anti-dumping duties. Compared with the completely monopolized domestic market structure, under the fully competitive domestic market structure, the optimal anti-dumping tax rate is higher. 3) under the premise of the government's average empowerment of the interests of all parties, the optimal tax rate is positively correlated with the domestic market capacity. It is negatively correlated with the marginal cost of the domestic firm and its upstream firm, and with the marginal cost of the foreign firm and its upstream firm.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：上海财经大学研究生创新基金项目“公共利益视角下贸易转移效应与反倾销措施有效性研究”(项目编号:CXJJ-2014-380)
【分类号】：F752.02

【相似文献】