移动互联产业滥用市场支配地位的反垄断法规制研究

发布时间：2018-06-03 02:04

本文选题：移动互联网 + 双边市场　；参考：《天津财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：二十世纪九十年代互联网开始进入中国并迅速发展起来,尤其是科技的推动带来移动互联产业的发展。根据《中国移动互联网的发展报告(2014)》蓝皮书显示的数据,我国移动互联用户的人数已经突破8.38亿,移动互联产业发展已进入巅峰时期。移动互联产业的发展带来的产品已经成为人们生活中不可替代的一部分,人们不用打开PC终端,就可以在随时随地上网冲浪,便捷的用户体验也让移动互联市场迅速的发展起来。然而事物总是具有两面性的,网络市场的在发展过程所出现的问题也越来越引起人们的关注。互联网延伸领域的新型的移动互联产业市场也出现了垄断的情况,米时科技公司因奇虎360公司滥用市场支配地位对其提起诉讼,2014年10月23在北京第二中级人民法院开庭—这场诉讼被予为“首例中国移动互联网反垄断案”。我国的《反垄断法》2008年开始实施,立法方面的滞后性、移动互联产业市场的双边特性和网络效应的特征使得在相关市场的范围的认定、市场支配地位的界定和滥用市场支配地位的认定出现困难。移动互联产业市场的垄断行为,会对社会公共利益和同行业的竞争造成很大的危害,市场资源流动放缓,竞争程度被压制,服务质量下降,最终受损害的是我们消费者自己,所以对于移动互联产业市场反垄断问题的研究是迫切需要的。文章以“3米”案为例,并以双边市场的视角与网络效应的特征分析和研究我国移动互联产业市场中滥用市场支配地位的违法行为。第一,研究移动互联网与互联网不同并分析移动互联产业市场的法律性质；第二,传统市场中的需求替代和供给替代的分析方法在界定移动互联产业相关市场时候难以发挥作用,提出需求替代性加盈利分析的方法；第三,移动互联产业市场中市场份额的因素应以使用时间、流量消耗和点击次数为主；第四,研究分析移动互联市场中滥用市场支配地位中违法使用原则和违法行为；最后,提出立法方面的完善建议,强化行业自律要求,并提出淡化相关市场的路径,突破传统的思维在排除其他可能性的情况下,将造成严重危害结果的行为认定为违法垄断行为。
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, the Internet began to enter China and developed rapidly, especially the development of mobile interconnection industry brought by the promotion of science and technology. According to the data from the Blue Book of China Mobile Internet Development report, the number of mobile Internet users in China has exceeded 838 million, and the development of mobile interconnection industry has reached its peak. The development of mobile interconnection industry has become an irreplaceable part of people's lives, people do not need to open PC terminals, can surf the Internet anytime, anywhere. The convenient user experience also lets the mobile interconnection market develop rapidly. However, things always have two sides, and the problems in the development of network market have attracted more and more attention. The new mobile interconnection industry market in the area of Internet extension has also been monopolized. Meishi Technologies filed a lawsuit against Qihoo 360 for abusing its dominant market position, opening on October 23, 2014 in Beijing's second Intermediate people's Court-the first China Mobile Internet antitrust case. The Anti-monopoly Law of our country began to be implemented in 2008. The lag in legislation, the bilateral characteristics of mobile interconnected industry market and the characteristics of network effect make the scope of the relevant market recognized. It is difficult to define and abuse the dominant position of the market. Monopolistic behavior in the mobile interconnected industry market will do great harm to the public interests of the society and competition in the same industry. The market resource flow is slowing down, the degree of competition is being suppressed, the quality of service is declining, and it is our consumers themselves who are ultimately harmed. So it is urgent to study the anti-monopoly problem of mobile interconnection industry market. Taking the case of "3 meters" as an example, this paper analyzes and studies the illegal behavior of abusing market dominant position in China's mobile interconnected industry market from the perspective of bilateral market and the characteristics of network effect. First, study the difference between mobile Internet and Internet and analyze the legal nature of mobile interconnection industry market; second, The traditional analysis methods of demand substitution and supply substitution in the traditional market are difficult to play a role in defining the relevant market of mobile interconnection industry. The method of demand substitution plus profit analysis is put forward. Third, The factors of market share in mobile interconnection industry market should be the time of use, the consumption of traffic and the number of clicks; fourth, the research and analysis of the illegal use principle and illegal behavior in the abuse of market dominant position in mobile interconnection market; finally, The author puts forward some suggestions on legislation, strengthens the self-discipline requirement of the industry, and puts forward the way to desalinate the relevant market, break through the traditional thinking, and consider the behavior which causes serious harm to be illegal monopoly behavior under the circumstance of excluding other possibilities.
【学位授予单位】：天津财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】