美国337调查中国内产业的界定

发布时间：2018-06-10 14:47

本文选题：337调查 + 国内产业　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：2010年至2015年12月,中国是美国的第一大贸易伙伴、第三大出口市场和第一大进口来源地。(1)随着双边贸易的持续发展,中美企业之间的贸易摩擦不断增加,其中涉及ITC对中国出口产品涉及的侵犯知识产权争议发起的337调查。(2)为此,我国企业应当从337调查的法律依据入手,据理力争。根据《美国法典》第19章第1337节的规定,其中的核心问题是是否存在美国国内产业。(3)在诉讼过程中,如果我国企业能够证明在美国不存在相关产品的美国国内产业,那么整个调查将失去基础。本文通过实证研究和比较研究方法,对美国337调查中国内产业问题进行全面深入的剖析,为企业进行诉讼提供帮助。本文通过三个部分论述国内产业界定问题,由于国内产业并不是美国337调查所独有的概念,因此,本文第一部分对法学和经济学中的国内产业概念进行比较分析,追溯其本源。第二部分重点阐述美国337调查中的国内产业及其具体内容,主要分为法定的知识产权权利调查中的国内产业和非法定的知识产权调查中的国内产业两部分。关于法定的知识产权权利调查中的国内产业将从经济和技术要素两个方面阐述,对于非法定的知识产权调查中的国内产业则主要借助于ITC的判例来分析,尤其是对我国影响较大的“天瑞”案。除此之外,第二部分还会对其他类似“天瑞案”这种对我国企业影响深远的判例进行归纳分析。第三部分对近些年来我国企业遭受的337调查进行综述,探究原因,除了我国企业自身创新能力不强,缺乏知识产权保护意识,确实存在侵权情况外,也有美国企业利用337调查程序快捷、管辖权宽泛、救济措施直接有效等优势扼制我国企业对美国的产品出口。为了改变337调查的不利影响,我国企业应当在事前的预警流程、事中的应对流程及事后的优化流程中注意行政法官对国内产业问题的论述,从国内产业存在与否出发,寻找突破口。此外,企业还应采用其他方式,例如,改进专利、结合行业力量等,以改变国内产业策略失效后的不利局面。
[Abstract]:From 2010 to December 2015, China was the largest trading partner of the United States, the third largest export market and the largest import source.) with the continuous development of bilateral trade, trade frictions between Chinese and American enterprises have been increasing. Therefore, Chinese enterprises should start with the legal basis of 337 investigation and argue hard for it. According to Section 1337 of Chapter 19 of the Code of the United States, the core question is whether the domestic industry of the United States exists.) in the course of the proceedings, if Chinese enterprises can prove that there is no domestic industry of the relevant product in the United States, Then the whole investigation will lose its foundation. Through empirical and comparative research methods, this paper makes a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the investigation of China's domestic industry problems in US 337, and provides assistance to enterprises in litigation. In this paper, the definition of domestic industry is discussed in three parts. Because domestic industry is not a unique concept of American 337 investigation, the first part of this paper makes a comparative analysis of the concept of domestic industry in law and economics, and traces its origin. The second part focuses on the domestic industry and its specific content in the American 337 investigation, mainly divided into two parts: domestic industry in the investigation of statutory intellectual property rights and domestic industry in the investigation of non-statutory intellectual property rights. The domestic industry in the investigation of statutory intellectual property rights will be elaborated from two aspects: economic and technological elements. For domestic industries in the investigation of non-statutory intellectual property rights, it will mainly be analyzed with the help of the ITC's jurisprudence. Especially the "Tianrui" case, which has a great impact on our country. In addition, the second part will sum up and analyze other cases such as Tianrui case, which have far-reaching influence on Chinese enterprises. The third part summarizes 337 investigations that Chinese enterprises have suffered in recent years, and explores the reasons, except for the fact that the innovation ability of Chinese enterprises is not strong, they lack the consciousness of intellectual property protection, and there are some cases of infringement. There are also American enterprises using 337 investigation procedures, broad jurisdiction, direct and effective relief measures to curb the export of Chinese enterprises to the United States. In order to change the adverse effect of 337 investigation, Chinese enterprises should pay attention to the exposition of the domestic industry by the administrative judge in the forewarning process, the response process and the optimization process after the event, starting from the existence or not of the domestic industry. Look for a breakthrough. In addition, enterprises should also adopt other methods, such as improving patents, combining industry forces, to change the adverse situation after the failure of domestic industrial strategy.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】