中美金融国际竞争力差距与双边金融市场开放

发布时间：2018-01-16 02:25

本文关键词：中美金融国际竞争力差距与双边金融市场开放　出处：《亚太经济》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过构建纳入金融监管指标的金融国际竞争力评价体系,研究中美两国在金融国际竞争力上存在差距的制度性因素,并在此基础上分析中美双边金融市场开放过程中的监管约束。评价结果显示,在2010-2015年这一期间,中美两国的金融国际竞争力都有所提升但差距较大,且相差程度在样本年份内并未发生明显变化;特别是两国在金融法规及监管理念上存在明显的冲突,由此强化了两国金融国际竞争力差距对双边金融市场开放的负面影响。为了进一步以金融改革促进金融开放,中国金融监管当局应该利用在上海自贸区推行的金融改革试验,从总体上提升中国金融市场的开放水平;并且应该通过双边经济对话机制,增进两国之间在金融监管体制方面的认同感。
[Abstract]:By constructing the financial international competitiveness evaluation system which includes the financial supervision index, this paper studies the institutional factors of the gap in the financial international competitiveness between China and the United States. On this basis, the regulatory constraints in the process of opening up the bilateral financial markets between China and the United States are analyzed. The evaluation results show that during the period 2010-2015. The financial international competitiveness of China and the United States has been improved, but the gap is large, and the degree of difference has not changed significantly in the sample year. In particular, there is a clear conflict between the two countries on financial regulations and regulatory concepts. This strengthens the negative impact of the gap between the two countries' international competitiveness on the opening of bilateral financial markets, in order to further promote the financial opening with financial reform. China's financial regulatory authorities should make use of the financial reform experiment carried out in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone to raise the level of opening up of China's financial market in general; And the bilateral economic dialogue mechanism should promote the mutual recognition of the financial regulatory system between the two countries.
【作者单位】：吉林大学经济学院;吉林大学经济学院国际经济系;
【基金】：教育部规划基金项目“中美经济相互依赖及其非对称性特征:基于世界经济格局视角的研究”(项目编号13YJA790126)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F832;F837.12
【正文快照】： 自从特朗普入主白宫以来,中美双边经济关系一波三折,跌宕起伏。然而,在中美两国元首于海湖庄园会晤后约一个月之际,双方在农产品贸易、金融服务、投资以及能源合作等领域的关键问题上取得了积极的进展,形成了《中美经济合作百日计划》。根据中国财政部国际经济关系司公布的协

【相似文献】