交通肇事罪之逃逸行为研究

发布时间：2018-01-04 08:35

本文关键词：交通肇事罪之逃逸行为研究　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来社会上发生多起重大交通事故案件,如“7.19”沪昆高速特别重大交通事故、西藏尼木“8.9”特别重大交通事故等,这些事故之所以在社会上引起广泛的关注,是因为其不仅造成惨重的人员伤亡,而且造成严重的财产损失。除了这些重大交通事故案件,普通交通肇事案件在社会上同样有很高的关注度,这是因为随着经济社会的不断发展,民用汽车数量在飞速增长,这无疑造成更多交通事故案件的发生,而这些事故造成的人员伤亡和财产损失令人发指。据统计1,2015年全国民用汽车数量达到16284.45万辆,交通事故发生的数量达到187781起其中死亡人数58022人受伤人数199880人直接财产损失103692万。与交通事故案件相比,交通肇事逃逸案件不仅造成交通秩序的混乱,而且会造成已有危害后果的扩大化,即造成更加严重的人员伤亡和财产损失,所以这种行为在社会上引起强烈的谴责。为了对这种交通肇事逃逸行为进行严厉地打击,1997年《刑法》和最高人民法院《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》均将肇事逃逸行为作为交通肇事罪的一种加重量刑情节予以规定,这在学术界引起了很大的争议,而且造成了立法和司法的不相协调。本文在参考各国立法模式的基础上,提出了将肇事逃逸行为独立入罪的立法建议。为对该问题进行详细地论述,本文主要分四个部分:第一部分对交通肇事逃逸行为的规范目的进行解读,在对立法现状和法律定性进行分析的基础之上,得出以下结论:交通肇事逃逸的规范目的应该是对受害者救助义务的履行;第二部分对交通肇事逃逸行为的立法缺陷进行深入分析,这种缺陷不仅体现在理论方面,更体现在司法实践中。而且这种缺陷是司法解释无法进行弥补的,所以必须对立法进行调整;第三部分对国外交通肇事逃逸行为的立法模式进行介绍,从这些国家的立法模式来看,其存在一个共同点,即均将交通肇事逃逸罪和交通肇事逃逸行为进行单独规定,这种做法无疑对我国立法调整具有一定的参考价值;第四部分从犯罪学和刑法学角度对交通肇事逃逸行为独立入罪的理由进行分析,在此基础上提出交通肇事逃逸行为独立入罪的立法构想。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there have been a number of major traffic accidents in society, such as the "7.19" Shanghai-Kunming Expressway especially serious traffic accidents, and Nimu, Tibet, "8.9" especially serious traffic accidents. These accidents cause widespread concern in the society because they not only cause heavy casualties, but also cause serious property losses, in addition to these major traffic accident cases. Common traffic accident cases in the society also have a high degree of concern, this is because with the continuous development of economic and social, the number of civilian vehicles in the rapid growth, which undoubtedly led to more traffic accidents occurred. The casualties and property losses caused by these accidents are appalling. According to statistics, the number of civilian vehicles reached one hundred and sixty-two million eight hundred and forty-four thousand and five hundred in 2015. The number of traffic accidents reached 187781, of which 58022 were killed, 58022 were injured, 199880 were direct property losses, one billion thirty-six million nine hundred and twenty thousand were compared with traffic accident cases. Traffic accident escape cases not only cause chaos of traffic order, but also cause the expansion of the existing harmful consequences, that is, causing more serious casualties and property losses. So this behavior has aroused strong condemnation in society. In order to carry out a severe crackdown on this traffic hit-and-run behavior. In 1997, the Criminal Law and the Supreme people's Court explained some problems in the application of the law in handling the criminal cases of traffic accident. Both of them took the escape behavior of the accident as an aggravating circumstance for the crime of causing a traffic accident. Yes. This has caused a lot of controversy in the academic community, and has resulted in the legislation and judicial coordination. This paper refers to the legislative model of various countries on the basis of. In order to expound the problem in detail, this paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part is to interpret the normative purpose of traffic escape behavior. Based on the analysis of the legislative status and legal quality, the following conclusions are drawn: the normative purpose of hit-and-run traffic accident should be to fulfill the obligation of relief to the victims; The second part of the traffic hit-and-run behavior legislative defects in-depth analysis, this defect is not only reflected in theory, but also reflected in judicial practice, and this defect can not be remedied by judicial interpretation. Therefore, we must adjust the legislation; The third part of the foreign traffic hit-and-run behavior legislative model is introduced, from the legislative model of these countries, there is a common ground. That is to say, both the crime of hit-and-run and the behavior of hit-and-run are stipulated separately, which undoubtedly has certain reference value to the legislative adjustment of our country; The 4th part analyzes the reasons for the independent criminalization of traffic hit-and-run behavior from the point of view of criminology and criminal law, and puts forward the legislative conception of independent criminalization of traffic hit-and-run behavior on this basis.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】