《当代中国》与美国中国学的发展（1997-2016）

发布时间：2018-01-13 04:36

本文关键词：《当代中国》与美国中国学的发展（1997-2016）　出处：《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：第二次世界大战以来,大多数研究当代中国的西方学者们(包括美国在内)总是局限于区域研究,并深受所谓的19世纪欧洲汉学传统的影响。这种传统把中国视为一个孤立、唯一的个案,强调中国独特的历史与文化,忽视中国研究中的社会科学方法和比较视角。因此,老一辈汉学家们大多关注中国的历史和语言研究,而避免用综合性的方法分析当代中国的政治、经济、社会和外交,更不愿用社会科学的方法研究中国。从20世纪80年代开始,美国的中国研究开始融入社会科学学科,新一代学者们试图应用并发展新的研究方法、概念或范式研究中国。正是在这种背景下,20世纪90年代初《当代中国》在美国创刊,它的出现填补了西方当代中国研究的空白。在20世纪90年代之前,西方的当代中国研究存在着"两张皮"的脱节问题,即传统汉学研究与现代社会科学研究脱节;关于中国的学术研究与政策研究脱节;西方的中国问题研究与中国的问题研究脱节。《当代中国》在这三个脱节中,架起了结合的桥梁、沟通的金桥。本文主要以1997年至2016年《当代中国》所发表的研究成果为分析对象。论文分为五个部分。绪论部分主要介绍了研究现状、选题意义、研究思路与方法;第一章介绍《当代中国》的概况,包括创办的学科背景、缘起和创刊目的;第二章从国别（地区）、行业部门、职业身份、职称、研究领域或专长五个维度,分析研究《当代中国》的作者群体,总结美国中国学研究队伍的构成与特点;第三章从文章内容的角度,对《当代中国》1997至2016年发表的全部论文进行主题分类,通过对分类主题的数量、比例统计,对当前美国中国研究的特点和趋势作一概括,并对篇目最多的"中美关系"类主题作议题细分和内容浅析;第四章主要分析总结《当代中国》的研究特点及不足。本研究的主要贡献在于:第一,通过对1997至2016年《当代中国》文章目录、作者队伍以及重要文章的梳理解读,并结合特定的国际环境、学术背景以及中美两国的国情分析,可以管窥美国当代中国学的发展状况;第二,初步总结了美国当代中国学综合性、跨学科、关注当代中国现实问题的特点,展示了《当代中国》杂志的权威性和国际影响力;第三,从微观和宏观两个方面对《当代中国》的基本情况及主要内容作分析解读,使国内学术界对这份杂志有更多的认识,有利于增强国内外的学术交流与互鉴。
[Abstract]:Since the second World War, most Western scholars studying contemporary China (including the United States) have always confined themselves to regional studies. And deeply influenced by the so-called European Sinology tradition in 19th century, which regards China as an isolated and unique case, emphasizing the unique history and culture of China. Therefore, the older generation of Sinologists mostly pay attention to the history and language of China, and avoid using a comprehensive method to analyze the politics and economy of contemporary China. Society and diplomacy are even less willing to study China in the social sciences. Since 1980s, Chinese studies in the United States have been incorporated into the social sciences. The new generation of scholars try to apply and develop new research methods, concepts or paradigms to study China. It is against this background that "Contemporary China" was founded in the United States at the beginning of 90s of the 20th century. Before 1990s, there was a disjointed problem of "two skins" in the study of contemporary China in the West. That is, the traditional Sinology research and the modern social science research disconnect; The disconnection between academic research and policy research in China; The study of China in the West is out of touch with the study of Chinese problems. In these three disjunctions, the contemporary China has set up a bridge of integration. Jinqiao of communication. This paper mainly focuses on the research results published in Contemporary China from 1997 to 2016. The paper is divided into five parts. The introduction mainly introduces the status quo of the research and the significance of the topic. Research ideas and methods; The first chapter introduces the general situation of "Contemporary China", including the establishment of the subject background, the origin and purpose of the publication; In the second chapter, the author groups of Contemporary China are analyzed from the five dimensions of country (region, profession, professional status, professional title, research field or specialty), and the composition and characteristics of American Chinese research team are summarized. The third chapter classifies all the papers published from 1997 to 2016 from the perspective of the content of the article, through the statistics of the number and proportion of the classified topics. This paper generalizes the characteristics and trends of Chinese studies in the United States, and makes a detailed analysis of the topics and contents of the topics of "Sino-American Relations", which are the most widely used topics. The main contributions of this study are as follows: first, through the catalogue of articles on Contemporary China from 1997 to 2016. The author's team and important articles, combined with the specific international environment, academic background and the national conditions of China and the United States, can provide a glimpse of the development of contemporary Chinese studies in the United States. Secondly, it summarizes the comprehensive and interdisciplinary features of contemporary Chinese studies in the United States, and shows the authoritativeness and international influence of the magazine "Contemporary China". Third, from the micro and macro aspects of the basic situation of "Contemporary China" and the main content of the analysis and interpretation, so that the domestic academic community has more understanding of this magazine. It is conducive to strengthening academic exchanges and mutual learning at home and abroad.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】