商标侵权损害赔偿额确定研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 05:23

本文关键词：商标侵权损害赔偿额确定研究　出处：《西南政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：商标权的价值和重要性已经获得了越来越多人的认可,完善商标权人的法律保护、促进商标产业的繁荣发展,已经成为促进国家经济发展的重要保障。本文以商标侵权损害赔偿额的确定为视角,试图通过对我国商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的司法实践以及相关立法现状的梳理,探索和分析其中存在的问题,借鉴域外相关立法及判例的优秀实践和经验,完善我国立法关于商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的规定,提升我国商标权的法律保护。除引言与结语外,本文分为四部分。第一部分,商标侵权基本理论探究。这部分主要由三方面构成。其一,商标权保护理论概述。商标权受法律保护是认定商标侵权行为的前提。本文通过比较国外“芝加哥学派”与“哈佛学派”关于商标保护的观点,得出商标权保护是符合时代潮流和确有必要的。其二,商标侵权损害赔偿原则探析。损害赔偿原则是确定损害赔偿额的重要保障。本文先介绍填平损失原则和惩罚性赔偿原则的产生及发展过程,再探究我国的商标侵权损害赔偿基本原则。其三,明确商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的合理性。本文从必要性和可行性两方面阐述损害赔偿额的确定对保护商标权人的意义,以及对维护商标制度良性运行的重要意义。第二部分,我国商标侵权损害赔偿额确定现状评析。这部分主要探讨两方面的内容。其一,先采用纵向分析和横向比较的方法介绍我国商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的立法现状,通过分析得出目前相关立法中存在的问题,即:缺乏统一操作标准和具体操作程序。其二,先采用案例分析与数据统计的方法介绍我国商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的司法实践,并归纳和分析存在的法定赔偿适用率较高和损害赔偿数额偏低的问题。本部分旨在探究我国商标侵权损害赔偿数额确定存在的实践问题,针对性地提出解决问题的方法,并为相应立法的完善提供实践经验。第三部分,域外商标侵权损害赔偿额确定比较研究。这部分目的在于探析四法域相关法律和实践与我国不同且值得借鉴之处,为我国相应立法的发展与完善提供域外法借鉴。作者以相关立法为线索、结合案例分析,通过比较美国、英国、日本和德国有关商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的立法和司法实践,总结其优秀做法,为我国相关立法和司法实践提供借鉴。第四部分,我国商标侵权损害赔偿额确定规则之完善。作者拟从立法、司法和观念三个角度提出完善商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的规则。首先,在立法上,需完善商标侵权损害赔偿额确定的立法规定,深化和细化损害赔偿额确定的标准,明确影响损害赔偿额确定的考量因素。其次,从司法上,应确定灵活收集商标侵权证据的规则。司法裁判应以现有民事诉讼证据规则为依据,有机结合证据披露制度和举证妨碍制度,完善专家辅助人制度,并采用优势证据规则认定案件主要事实。最后,在观念上,要树立正确适用法定赔偿制度的意识。应明确法定赔偿制度的适用条件和考量因素,有效发挥该制度的优势,避免滥用,充分保障商标权人的利益。
[Abstract]:The value and importance of trademark has been recognized by more and more people, improve the legal protection of trademark rights, promote the prosperity and development of the trademark industry, has become an important guarantee to promote the development of the national economy. In this paper, the trademark infringement indemnity to determine the amount of perspective, trying to determine the amount of damages to the judicial practice of China's trademark tort and combing the relevant legislation, to explore and analyze the existing problems, some practice and experience of foreign relevant legislation and case law, the perfection of regulations on the amount of compensation for damages of trademark infringement determination, enhance the legal protection of trademark in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part, explore the basic theory of trademark infringement. This part consists of three aspects. First, the protection of trademark rights theory. Trademark rights protected by law is the identification of trademark infringement The premise of behavior. This paper compares the "Chicago school" and "Harvard School" about trademark protection point of view, the protection of trademark rights is in line with the trend of the times and is necessary. Secondly, the principle of compensation for damages of trademark infringement. The principle of compensation for damage is an important guarantee to determine the compensation amount. This paper first introduces the generation and fill the development process of loss and the principle of the punitive compensation principle, to explore China's trademark infringement damage compensation principle. Third, clear the trademark infringement damage compensation to determine the rationality. This paper from the two aspects of the necessity and feasibility of determining the amount of damages for trademark protection and maintenance of the meaning, significance of the benign operation of trademark system. The second part, China's trademark infringement damage compensation amount to determine the status. This part mainly discusses two aspects. First, the longitudinal To the analysis method of the comparison and introduces the status quo of legislation compensation determine damages in China trademark infringement, through the analysis of existing problems in the relevant legislation, namely: the lack of unified standards and specific operating procedures. Second, the method of case analysis and data statistics of the amount of compensation determined the judicial practice of China's trademark damage tort, and analyzes application of higher rates and the amount of compensation is low the problems of statutory compensation. This part aims to explore China's trademark infringement damage compensation amount to determine the practical problems, put forward the methods to solve the problems, to provide practical experience and perfect relevant legislation. The third part, a comparative study of the compensation the amount of foreign trademark tort. This part aims to probe into four domains of law and practice in China and different and is worthy of reference for our country, the corresponding Development and perfection of legislation of extraterritorial law. The author provides reference to the relevant legislation as a clue, combining case analysis, through the comparison of the United States, Britain, Japan and Germany on the trademark infringement damage compensation amount to determine the legislative and judicial practice, summarizes its best practices, provide a reference for China's legislation and judicial practice. The fourth part, I China trademark infringement damage compensation rules. The author intends to determine the perfection from legislation, perfecting the trademark infringement damages the rules three aspects of judicial and concepts. First of all, in the legislation, the legislation should perfect the trademark infringement damage compensation amount to determine the amount of compensation standard, determined to deepen and refine damage, clear relationship the factors determining damages. Secondly, from the judiciary, should determine the flexible collection of trademark infringement of the rules of evidence. Judicial judgment should be based on the existing civil procedure rules of evidence on the basis of organic With the disclosure of evidence and obstruction of evidence system, perfecting the expert assistant system, and the advantages of rules of evidence to determine the case facts mainly. Finally, in concept, to establish the correct application of the statutory compensation system should be conscious. The applicable conditions and considerations of clear statutory compensation system, to effectively play the advantages of the system, to avoid the abuse, full to protect the interests of trademark rights.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】