评价理论视角下《经济学人》中国形象研究

发布时间：2018-01-29 14:14

本文关键词： 评价理论经济学人形象评价辩证分析法　出处：《西安工业大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪90年代,马丁及其同事提出的评价理论是一套应用语言表达态度的系统。本文以《经济学人》为研究语料,运用评价理论探讨其如何呈现中国形象,旨在指导人们更好地认识和理解评价理论,更好地表达自己的观点,辩证地看待其对中国的评价。本研究语料为2015年下半年《经济学人》中中国专栏的报道,共55篇,其中关于政治报道14篇,社会报道26篇,经济报道5篇,科技报道3篇,文化报道7篇,共择取92条语料。以马丁提出的评价理论为框架,从态度,介入和级差三大方面进行分析;以演绎法为主,定量分析为辅,定量分析采用语言学语料库统计软件UAM Corpus Tool,演绎法以评价理论为依据分析《经济学人》如何评价中国形象。研究结果表明,《经济学人》应用了丰富的评价资源呈现中国形象。其中,介入系统所占比例最高,为50.31%,其次是级差系统,所占比例为43.31%,再次是态度系统,所占比例为6.38%。由此可见,《经济学人》主要运用了评价系统中介入资源和级差资源对中国进行评价,说明报道主要运用数据说话,引用外部声音加强自身理据的说服力。第一,在态度系统中,鉴赏资源所占比例最多,态度资源中负面资源所占比例高于正面资源所占的比例,说明《经济学人》对中国保持一种负面的态度。第二,介入系统中,主要应用了对话性收缩资源强化观点,以此引起共鸣并表明报道者的立场。第三,级差系统中主要应用语势资源加强中国负面形象,侧面反映了西方媒体的担忧。总体说来,《经济学人》呈现中国的负面形象偏多,说明报道大部分是根据西方价值观念和意识形态看待中国,我们需坚定立场,努力维护中国形象;另一方面说明西方发达国家对中国的迅速发展存在一定的偏见和误解,我们需辩证看待,并正确地批判式地接受评价系统。
[Abstract]:In 1990s, Martin and his colleagues put forward the evaluation theory is a set of language expression attitude system. This paper takes the Economist as the research corpus, using the evaluation theory to explore how to present the image of China. In order to guide people to better understand and understand the evaluation theory, better express their views. The corpus of this study is the Chinese column of the Economist in the second half of 2015, with 55 articles, of which 14 are political reports and 26 are social reports. There are 5 economic reports, 3 science and technology reports, 7 cultural reports, and 92 corpus selected. Based on the evaluation theory put forward by Martin, this paper analyzes from three aspects: attitude, intervention and difference. The main method is deductive, the quantitative analysis is supplemented by quantitative analysis, and the quantitative analysis is carried out by UAM Corpus Tool, a statistical software of linguistic corpus. Based on the theory of evaluation, the deductive method analyzes how the Economist evaluates the image of China. The results show that the Economist has applied abundant evaluation resources to present the image of China. Intervention system accounted for the highest proportion, 50.31, followed by the differential system, the proportion is 43.31, again is the attitude system, the proportion is 6.38. The Economist mainly uses the intervention resources and the differential resources in the evaluation system to evaluate China, explaining that the report mainly uses data to speak, citing external voices to strengthen the persuasion of its own motivation. First. In the attitude system, appreciation resources account for the largest proportion, the proportion of negative resources in attitude resources is higher than that of positive resources, which shows that the Economist maintains a negative attitude towards China. In the intervention system, we mainly use the viewpoint of conversational contractile resource strengthening to resonate and show the reporter's position. Thirdly, the hierarchical differential system mainly uses the potential resources to strengthen the negative image of China. It reflects the worries of the Western media. Generally speaking, the Economist has more negative images of China, indicating that most of the reports are based on Western values and ideologies, and we need to stand firm. Strive to maintain the image of China; On the other hand, the western developed countries have some prejudice and misunderstanding to the rapid development of China. We should treat it dialectically and accept the evaluation system critically.
【学位授予单位】：西安工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315

【参考文献】