建设工程招标投标中的评标体系研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 03:05

本文选题：工程量清单计价　切入点：综合评标法　出处：《兰州交通大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前,我国建设工程领域已经全面进入了工程量清单计价时代,但是从招标的效果来看,工程量清单计价办法的实施仍没有达到更有利于市场竞争、降低造价的目的,而且又暴露了许多新问题,政府招投标监管部门的治理效果也不理想,该领域始终呈现“道高一尺,魔高一丈”现象。所以当前制定更科学的评标方法显得更有现实意义,以及如何营造公平、诚信、健康的招投标环境也是政府有关部门当前急需解决的问题。本文通过查阅近年来的相关文献资料,对我国目前招标领域出现的诸如招标人、投标人、政府监管、评标办法等方面的问题进行梳理归纳。针对某省房屋建筑工程招投标领域实行工程量清单计价后的中标情况进行统计,并对相关数据进行整理,在此基础上引入中标价限价偏差率的概念,用直方图法将中标价限价偏差率按照中标项目数进行统计分析,中标价限价偏差率分布呈现严重的正偏态,而且不同投资规模下的中标价限价偏差率呈现相似的分布,从统计数据可以分析出90%以上项目的中标价限价偏差率在3%以内。这种中标价限价偏差率小的结论与正常的正态分布相悖,所以当前市场状况明显不符合常规。分析产生该现象的原因:一方面是工程量清单计价下的综合评标法存在严重缺陷,投标总报价未作为评标指标;另一方面是招标市场可能存在较严重的围标、串标及大幅度压低招标控制价等违法、违规行为。这种现象不仅会导致招标人遭受严重经济损失,还会严重地侵害相关市场主体的合法利益,破坏招投标领域中公平自由的竞争秩序,妨碍招投标竞争机制功能的发挥。对于当前招投标领域存在的诸多问题,如若得以有效解决,需进一步完善招投标中的评标体系建设,评标体系构建应能覆盖影响评标结果的主要环节,论文提出了一种新型评标体系,包含建设工程评标办法体系、建设工程信息平台体系、建设工程诚信评价体系、建设工程评标保障体系四个方面,并进一步对各体系的内容进行分析与构建,从而为解决当前招投标过程中存在的问题,提供解决思路。
[Abstract]:At present, the field of construction engineering in our country has entered an era of bill of quantities valuation in an all-round way. However, from the effect of bidding, the implementation of valuation method of bill of quantities has not reached the goal of more favorable to market competition and lower cost.But also exposed many new problems, the government bidding supervision department's governance effect is also not ideal, this field always presents "the road is one foot, the evil is high" the phenomenon.Therefore, it is of more practical significance to establish a more scientific bid evaluation method, and how to create a fair, honest and healthy bidding environment is also a problem that government departments urgently need to solve.By referring to the relevant literature in recent years, this paper summarizes the problems in the field of bidding in China, such as tenderer, bidder, government supervision, bid evaluation method and so on.According to the statistics of the winning bid in the bidding field of a certain province, the paper introduces the concept of the deviation rate of the middle price limit price, which is based on the statistical analysis of the relevant data.According to the number of winning bid items, the deviation rate of the price limit is statistically analyzed by histogram method. The distribution of the deviation rate of the price limit in the bid price shows a serious positive deviation, and the deviation rate of the price limit under different investment scale shows a similar distribution.From the statistical data, we can find out that the deviation rate of the middle price limit price of more than 90% items is less than 3%.This conclusion is contrary to the normal distribution, so the current market situation is obviously out of order.The causes of this phenomenon are analyzed: on the one hand, there are serious defects in the comprehensive bid evaluation method under the valuation of bill of quantities, and the total bid quotation is not regarded as the evaluation index; on the other hand, there may be serious surrounding bids in the bidding market.String bid and greatly reduce the bid control price and other illegal, illegal behavior.This phenomenon will not only cause the tenderer to suffer serious economic losses, but also will seriously infringe on the legitimate interests of the relevant market subjects, destroy the fair and free competition order in the bidding field, and hinder the function of the bidding competition mechanism.If the problems in the current bidding field are solved effectively, it is necessary to further improve the construction of bid evaluation system in bidding. The construction of bid evaluation system should cover the main links that affect the result of bid evaluation.This paper puts forward a new bidding evaluation system, which includes four aspects: construction engineering bid evaluation method system, construction engineering information platform system, construction project integrity evaluation system, construction engineering bid evaluation guarantee system.Furthermore, the contents of each system are analyzed and constructed so as to solve the problems existing in the process of bidding and offer solutions.
【学位授予单位】：兰州交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F284

【相似文献】