基层法院公信力问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-18 22:21

本文选题：基层法院 + 公信力　；参考：《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来,我国各项制度建设步入了新的发展阶段,政治体制以及司法改革取得了长足的进步,现已形成了有中国特色的社会主义法律体系,配套的司法制度也基本确立。司法建设的快速进步,有力推进了我国的法制化进程和经济社会发展,然而由于多种原因,我国法律,尤其是司法公信力的不高乃至缺失却是不争的事实,司法作为我国社会公平正义的一道强有力的边界的作用未能充分发挥。来自最高法院的统计数据显示得出这样一种结论,从2011年—2014年全国各级法院办理的来信来访案增长率分别为7.4%、6.8%和7.1%,这些数据都反映出,目前基层法院司法公信力建设水平不高,社会认同度较低。在出席2015年全国“两会”接受记者采访时,洪道德教授指出,中国必须加快司法体制改革,提高司法公信力,切实解决我国司法领域中长期存在的效率低、乱作为、不作为、关系案和金钱案等问题,也是实现依法治国的重要途径。我国司法机关尤其是基层法院作为国家的基础审判机关,肩负着重要而又艰巨的矛盾化解、平安维护、发展推进、民主化进程加快和公平正义实现的神圣职责,一旦基层法院公信力缺失不仅会导致司法权威荡然无存,还会导致经济发展受挫甚至影响到证据的稳定。本文以当下实际存在的问题的为背景,分析了我国司法公信力问题,尤其是基层法院中存在的问题,旨在提出提高法院尤其是基层法院司法公信力的建议。本文综合运用宪法学、司法学、行政管理学、法理学和公共管理学等诸多学科内容,在分析、比较和借鉴的基础上,提出了提高我国基层法院公信力的建议。总体来看,本文由五个大的部分构成,第一部分是引言,通过现象引入要探讨的问题。第二部分介绍了本文论述中需用到的基本概念,它是本文研究的理论基础。第三部分是我国基层法院公信力建设的做法和成就,它为基层法院公信力建设提供实践基础。第四部分是我国基层法院公信力问题及原因的分析,它是本文研究的研究重点。第五部分是提高我国基层法院公信力的针对性对策,它是本文的有效成果。相对于同类型的有关研究,本文所具有的创新意义和实践意义体现为以下三点:一是本文的研究有助于开拓提升基层法院公信力的理论视野,;二是本文研究有利于提升我国基层法院的公信力,维护司法权威,培育公民的司法信仰,推进社会主义法制建设;三是本文研究有利于我国司法体制改革的纵深发展和依法治国进程的加快推进,为我国全面建成小康社会和实现中华民族的伟大复兴提供坚实的司法保障。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has stepped into a new stage of development of the system construction, political system and judicial reform has made great progress, has now formed a socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, and the supporting judicial system has been basically established.The rapid progress of judicial construction has pushed forward the process of legalization and economic and social development in China. However, due to various reasons, it is an indisputable fact that the credibility of our law, especially the judicial credibility, is not high or even lacking.The function of judicature as a strong boundary of social fairness and justice in our country has not been brought into full play.Statistics from the Supreme Court show that the growth rate of letters and visits handled by courts at all levels throughout the country from 2011 to 2014 was 7.4 percent and 7.1 percent, respectively.At present, the level of judicial credibility of the basic courts is not high, and the degree of social identity is low.In an interview with reporters at the National "two sessions" in 2015, Professor Hong Dao pointed out that China must speed up the reform of the judicial system, improve judicial credibility, and earnestly solve the long-standing inefficiency, misbehavior and inaction in China's judicial field.Relationship cases and money cases are also an important way to achieve the rule of law.As the basic judicial organs of the country, the judicial organs, especially the grass-roots courts, shoulder the sacred responsibility of resolving important and arduous contradictions, maintaining safely, promoting development, speeding up the process of democratization, and realizing fairness and justice.Once the lack of credibility of the basic courts will not only lead to the loss of judicial authority, but also will lead to economic development and even affect the stability of the evidence.Based on the existing problems, this paper analyzes the problems of judicial credibility in China, especially in the grass-roots courts, in order to improve the judicial credibility of the courts, especially the grass-roots courts.Based on the analysis, comparison and reference, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the credibility of our country's grass-roots courts by synthetically applying the contents of constitutional jurisprudence, judicature, administrative management, jurisprudence and public management.In general, this paper consists of five parts, the first part is the introduction, through the introduction of the problems to be discussed.The second part introduces the basic concepts that need to be used in this paper, which is the theoretical basis of this study.The third part is the practice and achievement of the construction of the credibility of the grass-roots courts, which provides the practical basis for the construction of the credibility of the grass-roots courts.The fourth part is the analysis of the credibility and reasons of the basic courts in China, which is the research focus of this paper.The fifth part is the targeted countermeasures to improve the credibility of our country's grass-roots courts, which is the effective result of this paper.In contrast to the same type of research,The innovative and practical significance of this paper is reflected in the following three points: first, the research in this paper helps to open up a theoretical perspective to enhance the credibility of the grass-roots courts; second, the research in this paper is conducive to enhancing the credibility of the grass-roots courts in our country.To safeguard judicial authority, cultivate citizens' judicial belief, and promote the construction of socialist legal system; third, this paper is conducive to the in-depth development of the reform of the judicial system in China and the acceleration of the process of administering the country according to law.It provides a solid judicial guarantee for our country to build a well-off society in an all-round way and to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.22

【相似文献】