中国经济史学的新发展——以1896年的经济学术公案为中心

发布时间：2018-02-26 20:22

本文关键词： 经济史学西学东渐陈炽《续富国策》　出处：《贵州社会科学》2016年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国经济史学具有传统与现代两种形态,前者即传统的"经世济民"之学,植根于华夏悠久的经济文化沃土而源远流长;后者即其现代形态,伴随"西学东渐"大潮逐步转型发展而来。1896年可视为这两种形态的转折点,突出标志就是围绕陈炽的《续富国策》及《重译富国策》引发的经济学术公案。120年来,学界对于陈炽到底是"续"亚当·斯密《国富论》,还是同文馆译著《富国策》等问题看法各异、莫衷一是。将相关问题置于中国经济学术史中进行深入考察,可以看到这正是学术转型时期的典型特征;西方经济学并非"传入"就等于"移植"成功,国人需要接受、消化、反刍、吸收等,才能逐步完成从传统的"经世济民"之学到现代经济学的最终"蜕变"。经济学术的现代转型并非一蹴而就,其也是中国社会经济发展与现代化进程的重要组成部分。
[Abstract]:Chinese economic history has two forms, traditional and modern, the former is the traditional study of "benefiting the people", which is rooted in the rich soil of Chinese economy and culture, and the latter is its modern form. Along with the tide of "Western learning to the east", the tide of gradual transformation and development has come. 1896 can be regarded as a turning point for these two forms. The prominent symbol is the economic and academic case initiated around Chen Chi's "the National Policy of continued enrichment" and "retranslation of the Rich National Policy". Over the past 120 years, Scholars have different views on whether Chen Chi is a "continuation" of Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations" or on the translation of "Rich National Policy" from the same literary library. They have different views on whether or not to place the relevant issues in the academic history of Chinese economics and conduct an in-depth investigation. It can be seen that this is a typical feature of the period of academic transformation. Western economics does not mean "transplants" success. Chinese people need to accept, digest, regurgitate, absorb, and so on. Only then can we gradually complete the final "transformation" from the traditional "benefiting the people" to the modern economics. The modern transformation of economic learning is not accomplished overnight, it is also an important part of the development and modernization of China's social economy.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国经济史学发展的基础理论研究”(15ZDB131) 中国社会科学院“长城学者资助计划”项目“中国经济思想史学科创新研究”
【分类号】：F092

【相似文献】