马克思主义经济危机理论史研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 05:00

本文选题：危机理论史　切入点：使用价值异化　出处：《厦门大学》2004年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本论文研究马克思之后马克思主义经济危机理论120年的发展史。首先，在评价国内外马克思主义经济危机理论史研究状况之后，，陈述了马克思主义经济危机理论史研究的意义，并提出研究方法上的基本思路。论文考察了马克思主义经济危机理论史发展阶段的不同划分，首次提出分两个基本时期来描述马克思主义经济危机理论的历史：从1880年到1940年为早期；1940年至2000年为现代时期。早期理论的发展可以用一个理论创新周期来概括，包括理论创新的准备阶段、高潮和尾声。早期理论的范式特征，是在对资本主义命运极限的反复追问中寻找革命武器，理论上以崩溃论的形式表现出来。斯威齐开创了马克思主义经济危机理论的现代阶段，并把理论的范式特征转换为资本主义停滞趋势的说明。作为顺应时代变化产物的现代危机理论，经历了从战后的消费不足理论到70年代利润率下降理论的转换，并出现理论的综合倾向。在经过了80年代和90年代理论的相对沉寂之后，布伦纳的理论把危机理论引向了全球视野时代。现代时期的危机理论批判性有所局限，危机理论范式面临着新的历史转折。论文试图超越危机理论的时代极限，寻找新的理论范式的可能性。从物质生产基础的分析出发，使用价值社会属性决定了一定时期社会使用价值总量的恒定性，价值的无限性和使用价值的有限性之间的矛盾导致了使用价值的异化。生产力的发展将导致社会价值总量的绝对减少的趋势，由此决定总需求的停滞趋势和利润率下降。价值交换活动趋于减少和非价值交换活动趋于增加的趋势，可能成为资本退出的一种方式。
[Abstract]:This paper studies the development history of Marxist economic crisis theory after Marx for 120 years. Firstly, after evaluating the research situation of Marxist economic crisis theory history at home and abroad, it states the significance of Marxist economic crisis theory history research. At the same time, the basic thinking of the research method is put forward. This paper examines the different stages of the development of Marxist economic crisis theory, and proposes for the first time to describe the history of Marxist economic crisis theory in two basic periods: from 1880 to 1940 as the early period, and 1940 to 1940 as the modern period. The development of early theories can be summed up in a theoretical innovation cycle, including the preparation stage, climax and end of theoretical innovation. In theory, it is expressed in the form of collapse theory. Swizzi initiated the modern stage of Marxist economic crisis theory, and transformed the paradigm characteristics of the theory into an explanation of the trend of capitalist stagnation. After the transition from the postwar theory of underconsumption to the theory of decline in profit margins in 70s, and the emergence of a comprehensive tendency of theory, after 80s and 90s after the theory of relative silence, Brenner's theory led the crisis theory to the era of global vision. The critical nature of crisis theory in modern times is limited, and the paradigm of crisis theory is facing a new historical turning point. This paper tries to transcend the age limit of crisis theory and seek the possibility of new theoretical paradigm. The social attribute of use value determines the constancy of the total amount of social use value in a certain period of time. The contradiction between the infinity of value and the limitation of use value leads to the alienation of use value. Therefore, the stagnant trend of aggregate demand and the decline of profit margin. The trend of decreasing value exchange activities and increasing non-value exchange activities may become a way of capital withdrawal.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：F091.91

【引证文献】