考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

发布时间：2018-03-19 06:50

本文选题：末端减排　切入点：过程减排　出处：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在限额与交易机制背景下,考虑排放依赖型生产商实施2种减排方式:"末端减排方式"和"过程减排方式"。通过构建参数模型展示2种减排方式下,排放依赖型生产商进行运作优化的思路以及决策结果的异同。此外,市场中绿色消费者绿色偏好的涌现,虽然对排放依赖型生产商来说,相当于间接降低了减排成本,能够促进排放依赖型生产商在市场交易和减排处理之间优先选择自身减排处理,但是,如果排放依赖型生产商选择的是"过程减排方式",那么他的运作决策就需要慎重执行,因为,只有有远见的排放依赖型生产商才能抓住绿色市场的机遇并做出最优决策以获取最大的利益。对于政府来说,一方面,可以通过宏观调控排放权的交易价格来引导排放依赖型生产商去探索最佳的净化减排方案;另一方面,还可以通过低碳宣传培养消费者的低碳意识以增强排放依赖型生产商进行自身减排的主动性。
[Abstract]:In the context of quota and trading mechanism, two emission reduction methods are considered: "end emission reduction mode" and "process emission reduction mode". In addition, the emergence of green consumer green preferences in the market, although for emissions dependent producers, is tantamount to reducing the cost of reducing emissions indirectly. It can facilitate emissions dependent producers to prioritize their own emissions reduction treatment between market trading and emission reduction treatment, but if emissions dependent producers choose a "process approach" to reduce emissions, their operational decisions need to be carefully implemented. Because only visionary emission-dependent producers can seize the opportunities of a green market and make optimal decisions to maximize the benefits. For governments, on the one hand, Emissions dependent producers can be led to explore the best options for purifying and reducing emissions through macro-control of the trading price of emission rights; on the other hand, Low-carbon awareness can also be fostered through low-carbon propaganda to increase the initiative of emission-dependent producers to reduce their own emissions.
【作者单位】：安徽大学社会与政治学院;中国科学技术大学公共事务学院;中国科学技术大学管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71571171) 中国博士后科学基金第58批面上资助项目(2015M582017)
【分类号】：X196

【相似文献】