价值源泉探析

发布时间：2018-04-17 08:17

本文选题：价值 + 价值源泉　；参考：《山西大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 由于价值是凝结在商品中的无差别的人类劳动，它反映了人与人之间的关系，，所以价值是由“物”作为它的承担者的，没有商品，没有“物”也就无法谈及价值。在之前我们总是强调“物”的有形性，但事实上，物既包括有形的，也包括无形的。反对劳动价值论者没有充分认识到价值和“物”(或者说是财富)的区别，他们抛开了人的劳动的特性，强调物和人之间的关系。而维护劳动价值论者则强调价值的劳动属性而不重视“物”的作用。这是属于不同层面的争论。在当前，不是价值的含义发生了变化，而是代表价值的“物”的内容和形式发生了变化。同时凝结在“物”上的价值也并不是一个静态的，而应该用过程的观点来研究。劳动是人同自然界发生的相互沟通的过程，由于社会的发展，人同自然界的交往发生了很大的变化。我们不能单纯地认为只有生产性劳动、只有直接和自然界发生交往的劳动才是劳动，只有这样的劳动才会创造包含到“物”的价值，才形成价值。而事实上当前社会已经很少有这样的劳动，人是作为一个整体，作为一个全球化了的整体在同自然界打交道。而且我们的劳动是一个历史的过程，今天我们以破坏环境的方式同自然界发生矛盾，那么我们就会影响到后来的人的劳动形式和结果。同样我们也受到历史人的劳动的影响。因此，把劳动作为一个动态的整体的劳动，我们就会认识到社会资本、人力资本、人造资本和具体的劳动一样是人的活动的结果并会影响到自然的“物”的创造。对于“物”的创造是同等重要的。可以看作是价值的源泉。本文除引言、结论外，共分三章，全文共三万字。引言指出本文研究的主要问题，研究的目的和意义。第一章传统的价值源泉理论本章重点分析了价值的历史含义，通过对财富和价值关系的分析指出：财富是从自然的、物的角度来看待的，而价值从社会的角度来看待的，价值是凝结在财富中的无差别的人类劳动；并且分析了财富形态的时代变化，无形财富的重要性在某种程度上超过了物质财富；并对我国当前各种价值源泉理论作了一个概括，指出他们之间主要的分歧存在于对财富和价值的关系、劳动、资本的不同理解上，核心是对价值含义的理解不同。第二章价值源泉的具体形态本章通过对劳动的分析指出，作为具体的个人劳动不是独立的，其本身就是社会的，劳动是一个整体劳动的过程，是一个合力；另外，人类的认识性劳动要比直接生产性劳动更为重要，科学性劳动、管理劳动就属于认识性劳动；社会资本、文化资本、知识资本、人力资本等作为特殊的资本同劳动有着重要的关系，是社会劳动的产物，对价值创造也具有重要的作用。第三章厘清价值源泉问题的意义本章指出通过对价值源泉的探讨，有助于我们重新认识劳动价值论、对整个政治经济学的重新认识都具有重要的理论意义；并可能对我国现行的分配制度，对我国现阶段的方针政策都有一定的现实意义。结论概括本文的主要内容，再次重申笔者的主要观点。
[Abstract]:Since there is no distinction between human labor in commodities, it reflects the relationship between people, so the value is "object" as its responsibility, no goods, no matter there is no necessity of value. Before we always emphasize the "object" is shaped. But in fact, both the physical objects, including invisible. Against the labour value theory is not fully aware of the value and the "objects" (or "wealth) difference, they abandoned the characteristics of human labor, emphasized the relationship between people and objects. And the maintenance of labor value theory is emphasized the attribute value and not pay attention to" material ". It is belong to different levels of debate.
At present, the meaning of the value is not changed, but the content and form of the "thing" that represents the value has changed.
At the same time, the value of the condensation on the "thing" is not a static one, but it should be studied in the view of the process.
Labor is human and nature of the process of mutual communication, because of the development of society, great changes have taken place in the communication between human and nature. We can not simply believe that only productive labor, only exchanges directly with nature and labor is the only way of labor, labor will create contains objects value. Before the formation of value. And the fact that the current society has very few such work is as a whole, as a whole in the globalization with the nature of dealing. And our work is a historical process, the destruction of the environment to today we have the contradiction with the nature, then we will be affected later people labor form and result. And we are also influenced by the history of human labor.
Therefore, to work as a dynamic whole labor, we will realize that social capital, human capital, man-made capital and concrete labour is the creation of human activities and the results will affect the nature of the "object". It is equally important to the "things" can be regarded as value creation. The source.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into three chapters, with a total of thirty thousand words in the full text.
The introduction points out the main problems of this study, the purpose and significance of the study.
The first chapter is the theoretical value of the traditional source of this chapter focuses on the analysis of historical value, through the analysis of the relationship between value and wealth that wealth is from nature, the view of value, and from the social point of view, there is no distinction between the value of human labor condensed in wealth; and analysis of the forms of wealth change with time, the importance of intangible wealth more than material wealth to a certain extent; and the current value of the source of all kinds of theory has made a summary, points out that the main difference between them in relation to the wealth and the value of labor, different understanding of capital, is the core of different the value of understanding of the meaning.
The specific form of the second chapter this chapter points out that the source of value through the analysis of labor, as individual labor is not independent, it is society, labor is a whole labor process, is a force; in addition, the recognition of human labor is more important than the direct productive labor, scientific labor, management labor belongs to the understanding of labor; social capital, cultural capital, knowledge capital, human capital as a special capital and labor are important, is the product of social labor to create value, also has an important role.
The third chapter clarifies the meaning of the source of value in this chapter pointed out through the discussion of the source of value, helps us to understand the theory of labor value, have the important theoretical significance to recognize the political economics; and may be on the current distribution system in our country, has certain practical significance to the present stage of our country policy.
The conclusion is to summarize the main content of this article and reiterate my main point of view.

【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：F014.3

【相似文献】