《历史唯物论与马克思主义经济学》简评

发布时间：2018-04-20 08:30

  本文选题：新韦伯主义 + 因果关系　； 参考：《经济学动态》2017年01期

【摘要】：正长期以来,即使在马克思主义阵营内部,对历史唯物主义的传统命题——生产力一元决定论也一直存在不同的解读,而在马克思主义阵营外,则存在着与生产力一元决定论相对的,以迈克尔·曼等人为代表的新韦伯主义的多元论。后者认为,并不存在具有决定性作用的社会领域(如经济),经济的、政治的、军事的、意识形态的权力都可能发挥决定性作用。一元论和多元论的分歧本质,不仅只是观点之争,也是关涉到历史唯物主义科学性的根本问题,对历史唯物主
[Abstract]:For a long time, even within the Marxist camp, there have been different interpretations of the traditional proposition of historical materialism, the univariate determinism of productive forces, while outside the Marxist camp, There is a new Weber pluralism, represented by Michael Mann and others, which is opposite to the univariate determinism of productive forces. The latter argues that there are no decisive social areas (such as economic, economic, political, military, ideological power) that can play a decisive role. The essence of the difference between monism and pluralism is not only a dispute of views, but also a fundamental problem concerning the scientific nature of historical materialism.
【作者单位】： 中南财经大学经济学院;
【分类号】：F091.91-5
，

本文编号：1777028