跨越式过渡何以可能——从“恩格斯文本”到生产关系变革的重新思考

发布时间：2018-04-28 16:01

  本文选题：恩格斯 + 跨越式过渡　； 参考：《社会科学辑刊》2017年05期

【摘要】：跨越式过渡一直是存有较大争议的问题。马克思逝世后,恩格斯在俄国的经济社会形态发展研究上面对两个难题,一是在俄国原有的农村公社基础上能否实现跨越式过渡?二是跨越式过渡的实现条件更多是靠内因还是外力?借助于广义政治经济学并从社会分工演进的视角探讨生产关系的变革,对理解跨越式过渡的可能性和实现条件有积极意义。跨越式过渡必须回答跨越后的生产关系是否具有可持续性,否则不仅会给"先补课、后发展"的历史倒退论者以巧辩的口实,更容易对科学社会主义理论产生误解。生产力水平不足、政权不稳定、经济体制改革偏离以及外界社会形态渗透都会造成跨越式过渡的不可持续。
[Abstract]:The transition by leaps and bounds has always been a controversial issue. After the death of Marx Engels faced two difficult problems in the study of the development of Russia's economic and social forms. One is whether he can realize the transition by leaps and bounds on the basis of the former Russian rural commune. Second, are the conditions for the realization of the leapfrog transition more internal or external? With the help of the broad political economy and from the perspective of the evolution of the social division of labor, it is of positive significance to understand the possibility and the conditions for realizing the transition by leaps and bounds. The transition by leaps and bounds must answer whether the relations of production after leapfrogging are sustainable or not, otherwise, it will not only give the historical retrogressionists who "make up lessons first, then develop" to argue skillfully, it is easier to misunderstand the theory of scientific socialism. The shortage of productive forces, instability of political power, deviation of economic system reform and infiltration of external social formation will result in unsustainable leapfrog transition.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：浙江大学“马克思主义理论和中国特色社会主义研究与建设工程专项”项目;浙江大学中央高校基本科研业务项目
【分类号】：F014.1;F091.91
，

本文编号：1815948